Effects of the Running of the QCD Coupling on the Energy Loss in the Quark-Gluon Plasma
Extracted source text ยท arXiv hep-ph/0610331
\documentclass[english,aps, superscriptaddress, floatfix, 12pt,
nofootinbib]{revtex4}
%\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\makeatletter
\providecommand{\tabularnewline}{\\}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
\newcommand{\pat}{\partial_t}
\newcommand{\Gk}{\Gamma_k}
\newcommand{\Nc}{N_{\text{c}}}
\newcommand{\la}{\langle}
\newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}
\newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\dd}{\displaystyle}
\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\del}{\partial}
\newcommand{\el}{\nonumber \hfill \\}
\newcommand{\Tr}{\mathrm{Tr}}
\newcommand{\E}{\mathrm{e}}
\newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber }
\def\slash#1{\setbox0=\hbox{$#1$} % set a box for #1
\dimen0=\wd0 % and get its size
\setbox1=\hbox{/} \dimen1=\wd1 % get size of /
\ifdim\dimen0>\dimen1 % #1 is bigger
\rlap{\hbox to \dimen0{\hfil/\hfil}} % so center / in box
#1 % and print #1
\else
% / is bigger
\rlap{\hbox to \dimen1{\hfil$#1$\hfil}} % so center #1
/ % and print /
\fi} %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\usepackage{babel}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\title{Effects of the Running of the QCD Coupling\\
on the Energy Loss in the Quark-Gluon Plasma}
\author{Jens Braun}
\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of
Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 19, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany}
\author{Hans-J\"urgen Pirner}
\affiliation{Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of
Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 19, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany}
\affiliation{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1,
69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
\begin{abstract}
Finite temperature modifies the running of the
QCD coupling $\alpha_s(k,T)$ with re\-solution $k$.
After calculating the thermal quark and gluon masses selfconsistently, we
determine the quark-quark and
quark-gluon cross sections in the plasma based on
the running coupling. We find that the running coupling enhances these cross sections
by factors of two to four depending on the temperature.
We also compute the energy loss $\frac {d E}{dx}$
of a high-energy quark in the plasma as a function of temperature. Our study suggests that,
beside $t$-channel processes, inverse Compton scattering is a relevant process for a quantitative
understanding of the energy loss of an incident quark in a hot plasma.
\end{abstract}
\maketitle
\bigskip
%
\section{Introduction}
The consequences of a strongly interacting
phase of QCD at high temperatures are currently very actively investigated.
The existence of such a phase was suggested in Ref.~\cite{Shuryak:2003xe}
after a careful analysis of QCD lattice data.
Moreover, it has been known for quite a while that perturbative approaches to QCD
cannot give final answers to many questions of heavy-ion
collision experiments, such as the short thermalization times of the quark-gluon
plasma.
High-temperature effective field theory has often
used a running QCD coupling depending on the temperature only
which may be justified at very high
temperatures~$T\gg \Lambda _{\text{QCD}}$, see e.g.~\cite{Blaizot:2003tw}.
%varies with momentum transfer only weakly in the range of momenta relevant at the temperatures.
In current heavy-ion collision experiments, however,
the temperature $T$ may not be the only important
scale, it is one among others, such as the momenta $p$ of the partons.
Therefore the running of the coupling
in the momentum regime, where $p\sim T$, has to be taken into account for the
computation of cross sections and energy-loss processes. In this paper
we present a first approach in this direction.
In Sec.~\ref{sec:RGcoup}, we review recently obtained results from
a calculation of the
strong coupling from first principles within the framework of the
functional RG~\cite{Gies:2002af,Braun:2005uj,Braun:2006jd}. Moreover,
we deduce a parametrization for strong coupling at zero and finite temperature
from these results. We use the results from Refs.~\cite{Braun:2005uj,Braun:2006jd}
for a computation of the parton cross section and the energy loss of partons in
the quark-gluon plasma in Sec.~\ref{sec:cross_section} and~\ref{sec:jet}, respectively.
In particular, we study the energy loss of an incident quark in the quark-gluon plasma
incorporating $t$-channel processes and inverse Compton scattering.
Taking the running coupling of QCD into account, we find
that the energy loss of an incident quark in a hot plasma is increased. Moreover,
our results suggest that inverse Compton scattering
gives a third of the energy loss of an incident quark.
Our conclusions and future plans are found in Sec.~\ref{sec:conc}.
%
\section{Running of the strong coupling}\label{sec:RGcoup}
%
Recently the QCD coupling $\alpha_s(k,T)$ at
finite temperature has been calculated by nonperturbative
functional Renormalization Group methods \cite{Braun:2005uj} and shows
a considerable variation with the resolution $k$.
The calculation employs the background-field formalism \cite{Abbott:1980hw} within
the RG framework \cite{Gies:2002af,Reuter:1993kw}.
The effective action used for the determination of the running coupling
includes an infinite power series of the gauge-invariant operator
$F^a_{\mu\nu}F^a_{\mu\nu}$:
%
\be
\Gamma _k= \int _x \left\{\sum_{i} Z_k ^{(i)} \left(F_{\mu \nu}^a
F_{\mu \nu}^a\right)^i + \bar{\psi}\slash{D}[A]\psi\right\} +
\text{gauge-fixing term} + \text{ghost term}.\label{eq:trunc}
\ee
%
The truncation of the full effective action includes arbitrarily
high gluonic correlators projected onto their small-momentum limit and
onto the particular color and Lorentz structure arising from powers of
$F^a_{\mu\nu}F^a_{\mu\nu}$. It represents a gradient expansion in the field strength
and neglects higher-derivative terms and more complicated color and
Lorentz structures. So far possible differences between
magnetic and electric terms have not been considered. In the background-field method, the
$\beta$-function of the running coupling $g$ is related to wave function renormalization of the background field \cite{Abbott:1980hw} via
%
\begin{eqnarray}
k\frac{\partial}{\partial k}g^2 = \eta\,g^{2}\qquad\text{with}\qquad
\eta =-k\frac{\partial}{\partial k} \ln Z_k ^{(1)}\,,
\label{betadef}
\end{eqnarray}
%
as a consequence of the non-renormalization of the product
of the background field and the coupling. The coefficient of the
first term $Z_k ^{(1)}$ in the effective action \eqref{eq:trunc}
evolves with the renormalization scale $k$, successively driven by all
other operators in the action.
In Refs. \cite{Gies:2002af,Braun:2005uj} the
authors keep track of all contributions from the flows of the $Z_k ^{(i)}$
to the flow of the running coupling.
They use as initial condition for the coupling the measured value
at the $\tau$-mass scale \cite{Bethke:2004uy}, $\alpha_{\mathrm{s}}=0.322$.
The resulting $\beta$-function at zero temperature agrees well with the
perturbative two-loop running in the $\overline{\text{MS}}$-scheme
at high resolution $k$.
It approaches a strong-coupling fixed point in the infrared (IR) \cite{Gies:2002af} in
accordance with results from the Schwinger-Dyson equations and RG flow equations
in Landau gauge \cite{RG_Landau_gauge,DSE_Landau_gauge}.
At zero temperature, the coupling $\alpha_s$ can be parametrized by
%
\be
\alpha _{s}(k,T=0)=
\frac{\alpha _{s} ^{*}}{\ln \left(e + \left(\frac{k}{\Lambda _{s}}\right)^a
+ \left(\frac{k}{\Lambda _{s}}\right)^b\right)}\,,
\label{Eq:alpha_T0}
\ee
%
where $\alpha _{s} ^{*}=5.7$ denotes the value of the IR fixed point and $e=2.718$.
The parameters $a,b$ and $\Lambda _s$ are given by
%
\be
a=9.07,\quad b=5.90\quad\text{and}\quad\Lambda _s=0.263\,\text{GeV}\,.
\label{Eq:para_T0}
\ee
%
Similar parametrizations were also found in studies in terms of
Schwinger-Dyson equation~\cite{DSE_Landau_gauge}.
At finite temperature $T$, the UV behavior remains unaffected
for scales $k\gg T$ and agrees well with the perturbative running
coupling at zero temperature for high-momentum scales.
In the infrared, however, the running is strongly modified compared to results
for vanishing temperature:
$\alpha_s(k,T)$ reaches a maximum at $k\sim T$ and then
decreases towards lower scales, see Fig.~\ref{fig:alpha_plot}.
This can be easily understood in terms of a simple picture:
below the scale $k\sim T$, gluonic fluctuations with a Compton wave length
larger than the extent of the Euclidean time direction
become effectively three-dimensional. Therefore the limiting behavior of
the coupling flow in this regime is governed by the spatial 3$d$ Yang-Mills
theory. Nontrivial, however, is the fact that the coupling decreases for $k<T$.
This is due to the existence of a non-Gaussian IR fixed point in the
three-dimensional theory \cite{Braun:2005uj,Braun:2006jd}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.9]{./alpha_Nf0_COMP_plot.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:alpha_plot} Comparison of the fit of the
running coupling (dotted lines) obtained from Eqns. \eqref{Eq:alpha_T} and \eqref{eq:fitpara}
with the full numerical result (straight line) for pure Yang-Mills theory
from Refs.~\cite{Braun:2005uj,Braun:2006jd} for $T=0.26\;\text{GeV}$ and $T=0.44\;\text{GeV}$.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
In the low momentum regime, the solution of the RG-equations gives
a linear behavior with a slope determined by the infrared fixed point of
the spatial 3$d$ Yang-Mills theory \cite{Braun:2006jd}:
\be
\alpha _s (k\ll T)\approx\alpha ^{*} _{3d}\,\frac{k}{T}
+{\mathcal O}\left(\left(\frac{k}{T}\right)^2\right)\,.
\label{Eq:limit_3d}
\ee
It is well known that the low-momentum limit
of thermal loops enhances the powers of the coupling as $\alpha_s T/k$.
From Eq.~\eqref{Eq:limit_3d}, we can read off that also the
enhanced effective coupling $\alpha_s T/k$ remains constant for $k\rightarrow 0$,
similarly to the coupling $\alpha_s$ at zero temperature.
We note that the IR fixed point in the 3$d$ Yang-Mills theory is
also in accordance with recent results in the Landau gauge \cite{Maas:2004se}.
A good parametrization of the running coupling at finite temperature
which respects the perturbative UV behavior
and the 3$d$ IR fixed point has the following form:
%
\be
\alpha _{s}(k,T)=
\frac{u_{1}\,\frac{k}{T}}{1+\exp \left(u_{2} \frac{k}{T} - u_{3}\right)}+
\frac{v_{1}}{\left(1+\exp \left(v_{2} \frac{T}{k} - v_{3}\right)\right)\,
\ln \left(e + \left(\frac{k}{\Lambda _{s}}\right)^a
+ \left(\frac{k}{\Lambda _{s}}\right)^b\right)}\,.
\label{Eq:alpha_T}
\ee
%
If we choose the parameters $a,\,b$ and $\Lambda _s$ to be the same as in
Eq.~\eqref{Eq:para_T0}, then the above parametrization agrees with this
equation at $T=0$ for
\be
v_{1}=\alpha _{s} ^{*}\,(1+\exp\left(-v_{3}\right))\,.
\ee
In order to take the limiting behavior of the coupling for $k\ll T$
into account, we choose
%
\be
u_{1}=\alpha ^{*} _{3d}\,\left(1+\exp\left(-u_{3}\right)\right)\,.
\ee
%
Here $\alpha ^{*} _{3d}$ and $\alpha _{s}^{*}$ denote the values of the IR fixed point
of $SU(3)$ Yang-Mills theory in $d=3$ and $d=4$ dimensions, respectively.
The remaining four parameters fit the numerical results for pure Yang-Mills theory
obtained from the RG equations in Ref. \cite{Braun:2005uj}:
%
\be
u_{2}=5.47,\quad u_{3}=6.01,\quad v_{2}=10.13\quad\text{and}\quad v_{3}=9.27\,.
\label{eq:fitpara}
\ee
%
As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:alpha_plot}, the fit is in reasonable agreement
with the results of Ref. \cite{Braun:2005uj}
for temperatures $T\in~[0.2\,\text{GeV},0.6\,\text{GeV}]$.
Phenomenologically, the strong variation of the running coupling as a
function of the resolution $k$ is important.
Especially the behavior of the coupling near its maximum
value influences physical observables. With increasing temperature the
position of the maximum shifts to higher momenta and the value at the
maximum decreases. On average, the system becomes less
strongly coupled for higher temperature, in agreement with naive
expectations from a temperature-dependent effective coupling. This
behavior influences the scattering cross section of a quark with
the particles in the quark-gluon plasma. As we will discuss below,
this elastic cross section contributes significantly to the energy loss of
an incident quark in the quark-gluon plasma.
\section{Effective cross section of an incident quark\label{sec:cross_section}}
Before we turn to the calculation of the cross sections, we discuss the
Debye mass $\mu _{s}$ which enters as screening mass in this
calculation.
As argued in Ref.~\cite{Peshier:2006ah},
the relevant coupling for the calculation of the Debye mass $\mu _s$
must be fixed self-consistently at the scale $k=\mu_s$, since in the
gluon polarization operator external
gluons have vanishing momentum. Therefore we use
the following self-consistent equation for the determination of the Debye mass $\mu _s$
to leading order~\cite{Peshier:2006ah}:
%
\begin{equation}
\mu_{s} ^2 (T)= \frac{4\pi}{3}N_{c}\left(1+\frac{1}{6}N_f\right)
\alpha_{s} (\mu_{s}(T),T)\, T^2\,.
\label{Eq:self_const}
\end{equation}
%
Results for the Debye mass $\mu _s$
are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:mu_plot} as a function of temperature for
three flavors.
Here and in the following we identify the scale $k^2$
set by the RG with the momentum scale $p^2$. This nontrivial assumption
is justified, because the regulator function entering
in the calculation of the running coupling specifies the Wilsonian momentum-shell
integration in such a way that the RG flow of the coupling is dominated by fluctuations
with momenta $p^2 \simeq k^2$.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.9]{./mu_mu_q_plot.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:mu_plot} The figure shows the dimensionless
ratios of the gluon screening mass $\mu _s$ and
the quark mass $\mu_q$ over temperature $T$ as a function of the dimensionless
quantity $T/T_c$ for $N_f =3$.
The chiral phase transition temperature $T_c$ is given in Eq.~\eqref{eq:Tc}.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Since we are interested in temperatures above the critical temperature,
the relevant values of the running coupling $\alpha_{s} ^2(\mu_{s}(T),T)$
in Eq. \eqref{Eq:self_const} lie near the asymptotic two-loop
scaling region, i.e. above the scale set by temperature $T$.
The mass of the renormalized quark propagator in hot QCD was calculated
in Ref. \cite{Pisarski:1987wc}. Along the lines of our calculation of the
Debye mass, we use this result for a calculation of an "effective quark mass" $\mu _q$
by solving the corresponding self-consistent equation:
%
\begin{equation}
\mu_{q} ^2 (T)= \frac{\pi}{2}\frac{N_{c}^2 -1}{2N_c}\alpha_{s}(\mu_{q}(T),T)\,T^2\,.
\label{Eq:quark_self_const}
\end{equation}
%
The results for $\mu _s (T)$ as well as $\mu _q (T)$ are shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:mu_plot} for $N_f =3$ massless quark flavors.
The solutions of the self-consistency equations~\eqref{Eq:self_const}
and~\eqref{Eq:quark_self_const}
exhibit a behavior in form of an alternating series in powers of $\frac{T}{T_c}$:
%
\be
\frac{\mu _{j}(T)}{T} \approx m_{0}^{(j)} - m_{1}^{(j)} \left(\frac{T_c}{T}\right)+
m_{2}^{(j)} \left(\frac{T_c}{T}\right)^2 -
m_{3}^{(j)} \left(\frac{T_c}{T}\right)^3 + ...\,,\quad\text{with}
\quad j\in \{q,g\}.
\label{Eq:fit_mu}
\ee
For our analysis, we use the following chiral phase transition temperatures
%
\be
T_c(N_f=2)\approx 0.186\,\text{GeV}\quad\text{and}\quad
T_c(N_f=3)\approx 0.161\,\text{GeV}\,.\label{eq:Tc}
\ee
%
These values, which were obtained from an RG calculation \cite{Braun:2006jd},
are in good agreement with lattice QCD studies \cite{Karsch:2000kv}.
The coefficients $m_{i}^{(j)}$ in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:fit_mu} depend on the number of flavors $N_f$.
The values of these coefficients for a truncated series, including powers up to
$(T/T_c)^3$, obtained from a fit to the full numerical data are
given in Tab.~\ref{Tab:coeff}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{table}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{c||cccc}
%\hline
$i$&
0&
1&
2&
3\tabularnewline
\hline
\hline
$m_{i}^{(g)}(N_{f}=2)$&
4.31&
-1.45&
0.40&
-0.04\tabularnewline
\hline
$m_{i}^{(g)}(N_{f}=3)$&
4.29&
-1.15&
0.28&
-0.02\tabularnewline
\hline
$m_{i}^{(q)}(N_{f}=2)$&
2.50&
-0.96&
0.27&
-0.03\tabularnewline
\hline
$m_{i}^{(q)}(N_{f}=3)$&
2.32&
-0.70&
0.17&
-0.02\tabularnewline
%\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\caption{The fitted values for the coefficients $m_{i}^{(j)}$ of the
power series~\eqref{Eq:fit_mu} for $N_f =2$ and $N_f =3$.\label{Tab:coeff}}
\end{table}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The Debye mass as well as the ``effective quark mass" enter into the calculation of the
effective cross section which a fast quark experiences when it traverses the quark-gluon
plasma. These masses serve as an infrared cut-off for the cross section.
In the following, we neglect the spins of the partons and
consider the cross section averaged over initial and summed over final
colors of both projectile and target partons. In a first approach,
this is a justified assumption for the processes under consideration \cite{Gyulassy:2003mc}.
Using the temperature-dependent coupling $\alpha_s(p,T)$, the Debye mass $\mu_s (T)$
as well as the ``effective quark mass" $\mu _q (T)$,
the total cross section of an incident quark obtains
\be
\sigma _{i}(T)= C_{i}\int _0 ^{s}
d|t|\,\frac{d\sigma ^{t-\text{ch.}}}{d|t|} + \delta _{i(qg)}\int _{\mu _q ^2 (T)} ^{s}
d|u|\,\frac{d\sigma ^{\text{IC}}}{d|u|}\qquad\left(i\in\{qq,qg\}\right)\,,\label{Eq:sigma}
\ee
where the factor $C_i$ denotes the respective color factor which
is $C_{qq}=4/9$ for $qq$-scattering and $C_{qg}=1$ for $qg$-scattering.
The differential cross sections for $t$-channel and $u$-$s$-channel processes
are given by \cite{Gyulassy:2003mc,Ellis:1991qj}
\be
\frac{d\sigma ^{t-\text{ch.}}}{d|t|}
=\frac{2\pi\alpha_s ^2\left(\sqrt{|t|},T\right)}{\left(|t|+\mu_s ^2(T)\right)^2}
\quad\text{and}\quad\frac{d\sigma ^{\text{IC}}}{d|u|}=\frac{4\pi}{9 s^2}
\,\left(\alpha _s ^2 \left(\sqrt{s},T\right)\frac{|u|}{s} +\alpha _s ^2 \left(\sqrt{|u|},T\right)\frac{s}{|u|}\right).
\label{Eq:dsdt}
\ee
%
In the calculation of the quark-gluon cross section we take into account $t$-channel exchange processes as well as u-s-channel exchange processes,
where the latter ones are the only processes possible in QED.
They are denoted as inverse Compton-scattering (IC scattering) processes,
where a fast fermion hits a thermal boson.
In high-energy astrophysics the energy loss of electrons in our galaxy
is dominated by scattering on photons of the cosmic-microwave background \cite{Bere}.
Moreover, it is also the main process for the production of high-energy
$\gamma$-rays \cite{Aharonian}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.9]{./qq_qg_cross_plot.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:cross_plot}The cross sections
for qq and qg-scattering in the quark-gluon plasma are
shown as a function of the dimensionless
quantity $T/T_c$ for $N_f=3$ massless quark flavors in the limit
$s\rightarrow\infty$. The chiral
phase-transition temperature is given by $T_c\approx 161\;\text{MeV}$.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
At finite temperatures, the effective differential cross section is
enhanced for $p\approx T$ due to the increasing of the running coupling with
momentum transfer $p$. This in turn
leads to a larger integrated cross section $\sigma _{i}$ itself.
The numerical results for the integrated cross sections are given
in Tab.~\ref{Tab:cross section}. To be specific, we show the cross section
for $qq$-scattering and $qg$-scattering in Fig.~\ref{fig:cross_plot}.
If one uses the running QCD coupling of Ref. \cite{Braun:2005uj}
for three massless quark flavors, one
gets a $qq$ cross-section of $\sigma _{qq}(T=1.3\,T_c)\approx 2.79\,\text{mb}$
at $T=1.3\,T_c$ and of $\sigma _{qq}(T=3.3\,T_c)\approx 0.24\,\text{mb}$
at $T=3.3\,T_c$.
For comparison, we have added in Tab.~\ref{Tab:cross section} the
calculation of the $qq$-cross section if the strong coupling would be
constant $\alpha_s=0.5$. The result from our
improved calculation is enhanced by a factor of four maximally
compared with the calculation using constant $\alpha_s$.
%
\begin{table}[t!]
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{c||ccccc}
%\hline
$\frac{T}{T_c}$&
1.3&
1.8&
2.3&
2.8&
3.3\tabularnewline
\hline
\hline
$\sigma_{qg}(T,N_{f}=3)\,\,\text{[mb]}$&
6.29&
2.78&
1.46&
0.86&
0.54\tabularnewline
\hline
$\sigma_{qq}(T,N_{f}=3)\,\,\text{[mb]}$&
2.79&
1.23&
0.65&
0.38&
0.24\tabularnewline
\hline
$\sigma_{qq}(T,N_{f}=3,\alpha_s = 0.5)\,\,\text{[mb]}$&
0.66&
0.34&
0.21&
0.14&
0.10\tabularnewline
%\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\caption{\label{Tab:cross section}Total cross section calculated
from Eq. \eqref{Eq:sigma} in the limit $s\rightarrow \infty$
for different values of $T/T_c$ for $qq$-scattering and $qg$-scattering
of the incident quark. For comparison we also show the results for $\sigma_{qq}(T)$
for $\alpha_s (k,T)=\alpha _s =0.5$.
The chiral phase-transition temperature is given by $T_c\approx 161\;\text{MeV}$.}
\end{table}
%
So the mean free path with the running coupling becomes much shorter
and even elastic collisions may enter into the energy loss
scenario.
\section{Jet's collisional energy loss}\label{sec:jet}
In this section, we discuss the collisional energy loss of an incident quark
in a hot plasma which we study with the running coupling depending on
temperature and resolution. Ground-breaking work on energy loss
of energetic partons in a hot plasma was done by Bjorken~\cite{Bjorken:1982tu}.
Recently this calculation has been redone with a running coupling in one-loop approximation
independent of temperature~\cite{Peshier:2006hi}.
We are interested in the energy loss due to elastic scattering of a high-energy
quark from a parton of momentum $p$ in the plasma for temperatures $T>\Lambda _{\text{QCD}}$.
Let us start with the calculation including the cross section for $t$-channel exchange
processes ($t\ll s$).
The cross section for such processes is given in Eq. \eqref{Eq:dsdt}.
The energy loss $dE$ of the high-energy quark per length $dx$ in
the hot plasma due to $t$-channel processes can be calculated as~\cite{Bjorken:1982tu}
%
\be
\frac{dE _q ^{t-\text{ch.}} (T)}{dx}=\frac{2}{3}\int d^3 p\, \rho_{\text{eff.}}(p,T)
\,\Phi\int _{t_1}^{t_2} dt \frac{d\sigma ^{\text{t-ch.}}}{dt}\nu (p,t)\,.
\label{eq:dEdx1}
\ee
%
Here $\Phi$ denotes the flux factor and $\nu =E-E'$ is the energy difference
of the incident and emergent parton depending on the thermal momentum $p$ and
the momentum transfer~$t$.
Considering the Casimir factors for the various processes, we have defined
an effective plasma density $\rho _{\text{eff.}}(k,T)$:
%
\be
\rho _{\text{eff.}}(p,T)=\frac{2}{3}\,\rho_{q}(p,T) + \frac{3}{2}\,\rho_{g}(p,T)\,,
\ee
%
where $\rho _{q}(p,T)$ and $\rho _{g}(p,T)$ are the quark and gluon momentum distributions,
respectively:
%
\be
\rho_{q}(p,T)=\frac{12 N_f}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\E ^{|p|/T} +1}\quad\text{and}\quad
\rho_{g}(p,T)=\frac{16}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{\E ^{|p|/T} -1}\,.
\label{eq:rho}
\ee
%
In our calculation, we take into account that the coupling $\alpha_s(t,T)$
depends on both momentum transfer $t$ and temperature $T$.
Finally, the energy loss will be a function of the
temperature and incident energy.
Note that the running of $\alpha _s$ was not taken into account by Bjorken
and only partially taken into account by a temperature-independent one-loop
approximation in Ref.~\cite{Peshier:2006hi}.
Following Ref.~\cite{Bjorken:1982tu}, we can write $\nu$ for $E,\,E'\gg |p|$ as
%
\be
\nu=\frac{|t|}{2p\Phi}\,.\label{eq:nu}
\ee
%
Using Eqns. \eqref{Eq:dsdt},\,\eqref{eq:rho} and \eqref{eq:nu}, the energy loss
of an incident quark propagating through a hot plasma is determined by
%
\be
\frac{dE_q ^{t-\text{ch.}}(T)}{dx}=\frac{4}{3}\,\pi \left(1+\frac{N_f}{6}\right) T^2
\int _{|t_2|} ^{|t_1|} d|t|\,
\frac{\alpha _s ^2 (\sqrt{|t|},T)}{\left(|t|+\mu_s ^2(T)\right)^2}\,|t|\,.
\ee
%
In our calculations, we use $|t_1|=s$ and $|t_2|=0$. Note that the energy of the incident quark~$E_q$ and the average value of $s$ are related by $s=2E_{q}T$.
However, even the limit $|t_1|\rightarrow\infty$ would be well-defined since
the coupling decreases logarithmically. In Fig. \ref{fig:dEdx_plot} we show the
energy loss of a massless quark as a function
of $T/T_c$ for different energies $E_q$ of the incident quark
due to $t$-channel exchange processes.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.9]{./dEdx_Nf3_diffEq_plot.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:dEdx_plot} Collisional energy loss of a massless
quark in QCD with $N_f =3$ massless quark flavors due to $t$-channel
gluon exchange as a function of $T/T_c$. We show the results for energies
$E_q=20,\,100,\,200\,\text{GeV}$ of the incident quark (from bottom to top).
The chiral phase transition temperature is given by $T_c\approx 161\;\text{MeV}$.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.9]{./IC_dEdx_Nf3_plot.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:dEdx_plot_IC} Energy loss of a light
quark in QCD with $N_f =3$ massless quark flavors due to inverse Compton scattering
as a function of $T/T_c$ for energies $E_q=20,\,100,\,200\;\text{GeV}$ of the
incident quark (from bottom to top).
The chiral phase transition temperature is given by $T_c\approx 161\;\text{MeV}$.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Next, we demonstrate that quark-gluon inverse Compton scattering also
gives a quantitatively relevant contribution to the energy loss for
a quark traversing the quark-gluon plasma.
Along the lines of the $t$-channel calculation we obtain for
the energy loss due to IC-scattering for large $s$:
%
\be
\frac{dE^{\text{IC}}_q (T)}{dx}&=& \frac{8}{27}\pi\, T^2\,\int _{\mu _q ^2 (T)} ^{s}d|u|\,\left(\alpha _s ^2 (\sqrt{s},T)\frac{|u|}{s} +\alpha _s ^2 (\sqrt{|u|},T)\frac{s}{|u|}\right)\frac{s-|u|}{s^2}\,.
\label{eq:dEdxIC}
\ee
%
The results for energy loss due to this process as a function of $T/T_c$ for
different energies of the incident quark $E_q$ are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:dEdx_plot_IC}
for $N_f =3$ massless quark flavors.
Comparing the results for the $t$-channel process with the IC process in
Fig. \ref{fig:dEdx_plot_COMPARE}, we observe
that the IC process enhances the energy loss of the incident quark.
Intuitively, this is clear since the s-u channel processes are central collisions where the high-energy particle can transfer more energy.
However, due to the screening mass of the quark, the largest energy transfers are reduced.
As far as we know, this process has not yet been taken into account in previous
theoretical work, cf.~\cite{Alam:2006qf}.
Taking a temperature of $T\approx 2\,T_c$, then
the IC process gives $\frac{dE}{dx}\approx 0.43\;\text{GeV/fm}$ compared
with $\frac{dE}{dx}\approx 1.15\;\text{GeV/fm}$ for the t-channel process.
The extra contribution due to the IC process helps to
explain the energy loss observed at RHIC which is dominated
by the early stages of the collision where the plasma is dense and hot \cite{Zapp:2005kt}.
The collisional energy loss is approximately of the same order as the radiative
energy loss~\cite{Gyulassy:2003mc}, since the density of the scatterers is
falling very quickly. For a recent discussion of this problem, see
also Ref.~\cite{Alam:2006qf}.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.9]{./dEdx_Nf3_COMP_plot.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:dEdx_plot_COMPARE} Comparison of energy loss
of a massless quark in QCD with $N_f =3$ massless quark flavors
due to inverse Compton scattering and due to $t$-channel gluon exchange
as a function of $T/T_c$ for energies $E_q=100\;\text{GeV}$ of the
incident quark.
The chiral phase transition temperature is given by $T_c\approx 161\;\text{MeV}$.}
\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Conclusions and Outlook}\label{sec:conc}
We demonstrated that the running of the QCD coupling in the high-temperature plasma
is important. The coupling varies as a function of the temperature $T$ and the
resolution $k$.
For momenta $|p|$ larger than the temperature $T$ the infrared growth of the
coupling enhances the cross sections and the energy loss considerably compared
with calculations with a constant value for the QCD coupling.
For momenta $|p|<T$, the coupling decreases due to the existence of a non-Gaussion
infrared fixed point of the spatial $3d$ Yang-Mills theory. In fact, this
decreasing coupling is only weakly sampled in the calculations because of the
screening masses of the quarks and gluons which serve effectively as an IR cutoff.
In addition to the effects arising from the running of the QCD coupling,
our results suggest that the inverse Compton process is a
relevant mechanism for a high-energy quark to lose energy in the quark-gluon plasma.
These findings may help to explain the observed energy loss observed at RHIC.
Based on our work presented here, one can estimate a thermalization time. One can
approximate the kinetic equation as the
scattering of a test particle having a saturation momentum $Q_s$
($\approx 1.5\;\text{GeV}$ at RHIC) in a "plasma" of temperature $T_0$
($\approx 3\,T_c$) after the time $\tau=\tau _0$,
when the colliding nuclei have passed through each other.
Explicitly considering that the expansion
of the plasma leads to a decrease of $T$ as $T_0(\tau_0/\tau)^{1/3}$, one finds
from collisional energy loss an equilibration time of $\tau\approx 4\tau_0$.
This time is somewhat shorter than the time found from radiative energy
loss~\cite{Moss:2001hq,Johnson:2000ph,Johnson:2001xf}.
Both mechanisms together seem to
give a reasonable short thermalization time, $\tau _{\text{eff.}}\approx 3\,\tau_0$
without involving new mechanisms.
%
\acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to H. Gies, J. Stachel and K. Zapp for useful discussions.
J. B. acknowledges financial support
by the Gesellschaft f\"ur Schwer\-ionenforschung (GSI) Darmstadt.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
%\cite{Shuryak:2003xe}
\bibitem{Shuryak:2003xe}
E.~Shuryak,
%``Why does the quark gluon plasma at RHIC behave as a nearly ideal fluid?,''
Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 53}, 273 (2004)
%[arXiv:hep-ph/0312227].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312227;%%
%\cite{Blaizot:2003tw}
\bibitem{Blaizot:2003tw}
J.~P.~M.~Blaizot, E.~Iancu and A.~Rebhan,
%``Thermodynamics of the high-temperature quark gluon plasma,''
arXiv:hep-ph/0303185.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303185;%%
\bibitem{Braun:2005uj}
J.~Braun and H.~Gies,
%``Running coupling at finite temperature and chiral symmetry restoration in
%QCD,''
arXiv:hep-ph/0512085; (submitted to Phys. Lett. B)
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512085;%%
%\cite{Braun:2006jd}
\bibitem{Braun:2006jd}
J.~Braun and H.~Gies,
%``Chiral phase boundary of QCD at finite temperature,''
JHEP {\bf 0606}, 024 (2006)
[arXiv:hep-ph/0602226].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602226;%%
\bibitem{Gies:2002af}
%\cite{Braun:2005uj}
H.~Gies,
%``Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory: A flow equation study,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 025006 (2002);
%[arXiv:hep-th/0202207]; %.
%%CITATION = HEP-TH 0202207;%%
%\cite{Gies:2003ic}
%\bibitem{Gies:2003ic}
%H.~Gies,
%``Renormalizability of gauge theories in extra dimensions,''
%Phys.\ Rev.\ D
{\bf 68}, 085015 (2003).
%[arXiv:hep-th/0305208].
%%CITATION = HEP-TH 0305208;%%
%\cite{Abbott:1980hw}
\bibitem{Abbott:1980hw}
L.~F.~Abbott,
%``The Background Field Method Beyond One Loop,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 185}, 189 (1981).
%%CITATION = NUPHA,B185,189;%%
%\cite{Reuter:1993kw}
\bibitem{Reuter:1993kw}
M.~Reuter and C.~Wetterich,
%``Effective average action for gauge theories and exact evolution equations,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 417}, 181 (1994);
%%CITATION = NUPHA,B417,181;%%
%
%\cite{Reuter:1997gx}
%\bibitem{Reuter:1997gx}
M.~Reuter and C.~Wetterich,
%``Gluon condensation in nonperturbative flow equations,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 7893 (1997);
%[arXiv:hep-th/9708051].
%%CITATION = HEP-TH 9708051;%%
%\cite{Freire:2000bq}
%\bibitem{Freire:2000bq}
F.~Freire, D.~F.~Litim and J.~M.~Pawlowski,
%``Gauge invariance and background field formalism in the exact renormalisation group,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 256 (2000);
%[arXiv:hep-th/0009110].
%%CITATION = HEP-TH 0009110;%%
%\cite{Bethke:2004uy}
\bibitem{Bethke:2004uy}
S.~Bethke,
%``alpha(s) at Zinnowitz 2004,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 135} (2004) 345.
%[arXiv:hep-ex/0407021].
%%CITATION = HEP-EX 0407021;%%
\bibitem{DSE_Landau_gauge}
L.~von Smekal, R.~Alkofer and A.~Hauck,
%``The infrared behavior of gluon and ghost propagators in Landau gauge QCD,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 3591 (1997);
%[arXiv:hep-ph/9705242];
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705242;%%
%
%\bibitem{Atkinson:1998tu}
D.~Atkinson and J.~C.~Bloch,
%``{QCD} in the infrared with exact angular integrations,''
Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 13}, 1055 (1998);
%[arXiv:hep-ph/9802239];
%
%\bibitem{Lerche:2002ep}
C.~Lerche and L.~von Smekal,
%``On the infrared exponent for gluon and ghost propagation in Landau
% gauge QCD,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 125006 (2002);
%[arXiv:hep-ph/0202194].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202194;%%
%
%\bibitem{Fischer:2002hn}
C.~S.~Fischer and R.~Alkofer,
%Infrared Exponents and Running Coupling of SU(N) Yang--Mills Theories,
Phys. Lett. {\bf B536}, 177 (2002).
%[arXiv:hep-ph/0202202];
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202202;%%
%
\bibitem{RG_Landau_gauge}
%\cite{Pawlowski:2003hq}
%\bibitem{Pawlowski:2003hq}
J.~M.~Pawlowski, D.~F.~Litim, S.~Nedelko and L.~von Smekal,
%``Infrared behaviour and fixed points in Landau gauge QCD,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 93}, 152002 (2004);
%[arXiv:hep-th/0312324].
%%CITATION = HEP-TH 0312324;%%
%
%\cite{Fischer:2004uk}
%\bibitem{Fischer:2004uk}
C.~S.~Fischer and H.~Gies,
%``Renormalization flow of Yang-Mills propagators,''
JHEP {\bf 0410}, 048 (2004).
%[arXiv:hep-ph/0408089].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408089;%%
%\cite{Maas:2004se}
\bibitem{Maas:2004se}
A.~Maas, J.~Wambach, B.~Gruter and R.~Alkofer,
%``High-temperature limit of Landau-gauge Yang-Mills theory,''
Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 37}, 335 (2004);
%[arXiv:hep-ph/0408074].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0408074;%%
%\cite{Maas:2005hs}
%\bibitem{Maas:2005hs}
A.~Maas, J.~Wambach and R.~Alkofer,
%``The high-temperature phase of Landau-gauge Yang-Mills theory,''
Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 42}, 93 (2005).
%[arXiv:hep-ph/0504019].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0504019;%%
\cite{Maas:2004se}
%\cite{Peshier:2006ah}
\bibitem{Peshier:2006ah}
A.~Peshier,
%``Running coupling and screening in the (s)QGP,''
arXiv:hep-ph/0601119.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601119;%%
%\cite{Pisarski:1987wc}
\bibitem{Pisarski:1987wc}
R.~D.~Pisarski,
%``Computing Finite Temperature Loops With Ease,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 309}, 476 (1988).
%%CITATION = NUPHA,B309,476;%%
%\cite{Karsch:2000kv}
\bibitem{Karsch:2000kv}
F.~Karsch, E.~Laermann and A.~Peikert,
%``Quark mass and flavor dependence of the QCD phase transition,''
Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 605} (2001) 579.
%[arXiv:hep-lat/0012023].
%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0012023;%%
%\cite{Gyulassy:2003mc}
\bibitem{Gyulassy:2003mc}
M.~Gyulassy, I.~Vitev, X.~N.~Wang and B.~W.~Zhang,
%``Jet quenching and radiative energy loss in dense nuclear matter,''
arXiv:nucl-th/0302077.
%%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0302077;%%
%
%\cite{Ellis:1991qj}
\bibitem{Ellis:1991qj}
R.~K.~Ellis, W.~J.~Stirling and B.~R.~Webber,
%``QCD and collider physics,''
Camb.\ Monogr.\ Part.\ Phys.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ Cosmol.\ {\bf 8}, 1 (1996).
%%CITATION = CMPCE,8,1;%%
\bibitem {Bere}
V.S. Berezinskii, S.V. Bulanov, V. A. Dogiel, V.L. Ginzburg and V.S. Ptuskin;
Astrophysics of Cosmic Rays, p.124 ff.,Amsterdam , 1990
\bibitem {Aharonian} F. A. Aharonian;
Very high energy cosmic gamma radiation : a crucial window on the extreme universe,
Singapore, 2004.
%\cite{Bjorken:1982tu}
\bibitem{Bjorken:1982tu}
J.~D.~Bjorken,
%``Energy Loss Of Energetic Partons In Quark - Gluon Plasma: Possible Extinction
%Of High P(T) Jets In Hadron - Hadron Collisions,''
FERMILAB-PUB-82-059-THY
%\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=fermilab-pub-82-059-thy}{SPIRES entry}
%\cite{Peshier:2006hi}
\bibitem{Peshier:2006hi}
A.~Peshier,
%``The QCD collisional energy loss revised,''
arXiv:hep-ph/0605294.
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0605294;%%
%\cite{Alam:2006qf}
\bibitem{Alam:2006qf}
J.~e.~Alam, A.~K.~Dutt-Mazumder and P.~Roy,
%``Collisional energy loss and the suppression of high p(T) hadrons,''
arXiv:nucl-th/0608058.
%%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0608058;%%
%\cite{Zapp:2005kt}
\bibitem{Zapp:2005kt}
K.~Zapp, G.~Ingelman, J.~Rathsman and J.~Stachel,
%``Jet quenching from soft QCD scattering in the quark-gluon plasma,''
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 637} (2006) 179
[arXiv:hep-ph/0512300].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512300;%%
%\cite{Moss:2001hq}
\bibitem{Moss:2001hq}
J.~M.~Moss {\it et al.},
%``Energy loss of fast quarks in nuclei,''
arXiv:hep-ex/0109014.
%%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109014;%%
%\cite{Johnson:2000ph}
\bibitem{Johnson:2000ph}
M.~B.~Johnson {\it et al.} [FNAL E772 Collaboration],
%``Energy loss of fast quarks in nuclei,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 4483 (2001)
[arXiv:hep-ex/0010051].
%%CITATION = HEP-EX 0010051;%%
%\cite{Johnson:2001xf}
\bibitem{Johnson:2001xf}
M.~B.~Johnson {\it et al.},
%``Energy loss versus shadowing in the Drell-Yan reaction on nuclei,''
Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 65}, 025203 (2002)
[arXiv:hep-ph/0105195].
%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105195;%%
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}