A non-commutative Minkowskian spacetime from a quantum AdS algebra
Extracted source text ยท arXiv hep-th/0306089
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% STANDARD SIZE ADJUSTMENTS %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\parskip=0.5ex
\oddsidemargin= 0.55cm
\evensidemargin= 0.55cm
\textheight=23.0cm
\parindent=1.5em
\textwidth=15cm
\topmargin=-1.0cm
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% GENERAL DEFINITIONS %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newcommand{\sect}[1]{\setcounter{equation}{0}\section{#1}}
\newcommand{\subsect}[1]{\subsection{#1}}
\newcommand{\subsubsect}[1]{\subsubsection{#1}}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% DEFINITIONS %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
\newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
\newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray}}
\newcommand{\f}{\frac}
\newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
\newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
\def\1{\'{\i}}
\def\R{{\mathbb R}}
\def\>#1{{\bf #1}}
\def\k{\omega}
\def\d{{\rm d}}
\def\ie{{\rm i}}
\def\adl{L}
\def\tt{T}
\def\gadl{\hat l}
\def\gtt{\hat t}
\def\radio{R}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\baselineskip=18pt
\thispagestyle{empty}
\
\hfill\
\begin{center}
{\Large{\bf{A non-commutative Minkowskian
spacetime from a quantum AdS algebra}}}
\end{center}
\bigskip
\medskip
\begin{center}
Angel~BALLESTEROS$^a$, N.~Rossano~BRUNO$^{a,b}$, Francisco~J.~HERRANZ$^a$
\end{center}
\begin{center} {\it {
${}^a$Departamento de F\1sica,
Universidad de Burgos, Pza.\ Misael Ba\~nuelos s.n., \\
09001 Burgos, Spain }}\\
e-mail: angelb@ubu.es, fjherranz@ubu.es
\end{center}
\begin{center} {\it {
${}^b$Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma ROMA TRE, and INFN Sez.\ Roma Tre, Via Vasca Navale 84,
00146 Roma, Italy}}\\
e-mail: rossano@fis.uniroma3.it
\end{center}
\bigskip
\medskip
\begin{abstract}
\noindent
A quantum deformation of the conformal algebra of the Minkowskian
spacetime in $(3+1)$ dimensions is identified with a deformation of the
$(4+1)$-dimensional AdS algebra. Both Minkowskian
and AdS first-order non-commutative spaces are explicitly obtained, and the former coincides with
the well known $\kappa$-Minkowski space. Next, by working in the conformal basis, a new
non-commutative Minkowskian spacetime is constructed through the full (all orders) dual quantum
group spanned by deformed Poincar\'e and dilation symmetries. Although Lorentz invariance is
lost, the resulting non-commutative spacetime is quantum group covariant, preserves
space isotropy and, furthermore, can be interpreted as a generalization of the
$\kappa$-Minkowski space in which a variable fundamental scale (Planck length)
appears.
\end{abstract}
\bigskip\medskip
\noindent
KEYWORDS: quantum algebras,
deformation, Minkowski, Anti-deSitter, Poincar\'e, non-commutative spacetime
\noindent
PACS: 02.20.Uw\quad 11.30.-j\quad 04.60.-m
\bigskip\medskip
%\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Introduction}
One of the most relevant applications of quantum groups in physics is
the construction of deformed spacetime symmetries that generalize classical
Poincar\'e kinematics beyond Lie algebras,
such as the well known $\kappa$-Poincar\'e
\cite{LukierskiRuegg1992,Giller,Lukierskib} and the quantum null-plane (or light-cone)
Poincar\'e
\cite{nulla,nullb} algebras. For all these cases, the deformation parameter has been interpreted
as a fundamental scale which may be related with the Planck length. In fact, these results
can be seen as different attempts to develop new approaches to physics at the Planck
scale, an idea that was early presented in \cite{Majida}. A further physical development of the
$\kappa$-Poincar\'e algebra has
led to the so called doubly special relativity (DSR) theories
\cite{Amelino-Camelia:2001xx,Amelino-Camelia:2000mn,
MagueijoSmolin,Amelino-Camelia:2002vy,Kowalski-Glikman:2002we}
that analyse the fundamental role assigned to the deformation parameter/Planck length as an
observer-independent length scale to be considered together with the usual observer-independent
velocity scale $c$, in such a manner that Lorentz invariance is preserved
\cite{Bruno:primo,Bruno:2002wc,Lukierski:2002df}.
From a dual quantum group perspective, when the quantum
spacetime coordinates $\hat x^\mu$ conjugated to the $\kappa$-Poincar\'e momentum-space
$P_\mu$ (translations)
are considered, the non-commutative $\kappa$-Minkowski spacetime
arises \cite{Maslanka,Majid:1994cy,Zak,LukR}. Some field theories on such a space have been
proposed (see \cite{Amelino-Camelia:2002mu} and
references therein) and its role in DSR theories has been analysed
\cite{Kowalski-Glikman:2002jr}. More general non-commutative Minkowskian
spacetimes can be expressed by means of the following Lie algebra commutation
rules~\cite{Lukierskid}:
\beq
[\hat x^\mu, \hat x^\nu]=\frac 1{\kappa} (a^\mu\hat x^\nu-a^\nu\hat x^\mu),
\label{aa}
\eeq
where $a^\mu$ is a {\em constant} four-vector in the Minkowskian space.
In the context of $\kappa$-deformations, which are understood as quantum algebras with a
dimensionful deformation parameter related with the Planck length, Poincar\'e symmetry should be
taken only as a first stage that should be embedded in some way within more general structures
such as deformed conformal or AdS/dS symmetries, that is, quantum $so(4,2)$/$so(5,1)$ algebras.
Thus, it is natural to think that a non-commutative Minkowskian space of the form (\ref{aa})
could also be either embedded or generalized. In this respect, by considering the simplest quantum
deformation of the Weyl--Poincar\'e algebra (isometries plus dilations), $U_\tau({\cal WP})$
\cite{Herranz:2002fe}, a new DSR proposal has been presented in \cite{Ball}. Such a quantum
algebra arises as a Hopf subalgebra of a `mass-like' quantum deformation $U_\tau(so(4,2))$ of
the conformal algebra of the $(3+1)$D Minkowskian space.
The aim of this letter is to analyse the first-order (in both the deformation parameter
and non-commutative coordinates) quantum group dual to
$U_\tau(so(4,2))$, to
construct the complete (all orders) Hopf algebra dual to
$U_\tau({\cal WP})$ and, afterwards, to extract some physical implications
of the associated non-commutative Minkows\-kian spacetime.
In the next section we identify the
deformation $U_\tau(so(4,2))$, formerly obtained in a conformal basis, with a $(4+1)$D quantum
AdS algebra at both algebra and dual group levels. By using the Hopf subalgebra
spanned by the deformed
Poincar\'e and dilation generators we compute in
section 3 the associated dual quantum group by making use of the quantum $\cal R$-matrix. The
last section is devoted to derive the physical consequences conveyed by the resulting
non-commutative Minlowskian spacetime which is covariant under quantum group transformations and
does preserve space isotropy, although its Lorentz invariance is lost. Moreover, this new
non-commutative spacetime generalizes $\kappa$-Minkowski space since it is defined through Lie
algebra commutation rules whose structure constants are the quantum group entries associated to
the Lorentz sector.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Quantum AdS algebra}
Let us consider the quantum deformation \cite{Herranz:2002fe} of the conformal
algebra of the $(3+1)$D Minkowskian spacetime, $U_\tau(so(4,2))\equiv
U_\tau({\cal CM}^{3+1})$,
which is spanned by
the generators of rotations $J_i$, time and space
translations $P_\mu$, boosts $K_i$, conformal transformations $C_\mu$ and
dilations $D$. Hereafter we assume $c= \hbar =1$ ($\omega=1$ in \cite{Herranz:2002fe}),
sum over repeated indices, Latin indices $i,j,k=1,2,3$, and Greek
indices $\mu,\nu=0,1,2,3$. The non-vanishing deformed commutation rules and coproduct
for $U_\tau({\cal CM}^{3+1})$ are given by
\beq
\begin{array}{lll}
[J_i,J_j]= \varepsilon_{ijk}J_k ,&\qquad
[J_i,K_j]= \varepsilon_{ijk}K_k ,&\qquad
[J_i,P_j]= \varepsilon_{ijk}P_k , \\[2pt]
[K_i,K_j]=- \varepsilon_{ijk}J_k ,
&\qquad [K_i,P_0]= {\rm e}^{-\tau P_0} P_i ,&\qquad
[D,P_i]= P_i ,\\[2pt]
\displaystyle{ [K_i,P_i]=
\frac{{\rm e}^{\tau P_0}-1}{\tau} } ,&\qquad
\displaystyle{[D,P_0]= \frac{1-{\rm e}^{-\tau P_0}}{\tau}} ,&
\end{array}
\label{ba}
\eeq
\beq
\begin{array}{lll}
[J_i,C_j]= \varepsilon_{ijk}C_k ,&\qquad
[D,C_i]=- C_i ,&\qquad [D,C_0]=- C_0+\tau D^2 , \\[2pt]
[P_0,C_0]=-2 D , &\qquad
[K_i,C_0]= C_i ,&\qquad [K_i,C_i]= C_0 -\tau D^2 , \\[2pt]
\multicolumn3{l}{ [C_0,C_i]=- \tau(D C_i + C_i D) ,
\qquad\quad [P_0,C_i]= {\rm e}^{-\tau P_0}
K_i+K_i\,{\rm e}^{-\tau P_0} ,}\\[2pt]
\multicolumn3{l}{ [P_i,C_j]=2 (\delta_{ij}D - \varepsilon_{ijk} J_k) ,
\qquad\quad
[C_0,P_i]=2 K_i+ \tau (D P_i + P_i D) , }
\end{array}
\label{bb}
\eeq
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
\Delta(P_0)=1\otimes P_0 + P_0\otimes 1 ,
\qquad \Delta(P_i)=1\otimes P_i + P_i\otimes {\rm e}^{\tau P_0} ,\\[4pt]
\Delta(J_i)= 1\otimes J_i + J_i\otimes 1 ,\qquad\ \ \Delta(D)=1\otimes D +
D\otimes {\rm e}^{-\tau P_0} ,\\[4pt]
\Delta(K_i)=1\otimes K_i + K_i\otimes 1-\tau D\otimes {\rm
e}^{-\tau P_0}P_i ,\qquad \Delta(C_0)=1\otimes C_0 + C_0\otimes {\rm
e}^{-\tau P_0} ,\nonumber\\[4pt]
\Delta(C_i)=1\otimes C_i + C_i\otimes {\rm e}^{-\tau
P_0}+2\tau D\otimes {\rm e}^{-\tau P_0}K_i-\tau^2 (D^2+ D) \otimes {\rm
e}^{-2\tau P_0} P_i .
\end{array}
\label{bc}
\eeq
The
deformation parameter $\tau$ will be identified with the Planck
length: $\tau\sim L_p$ \cite{Ball}.
Some properties of $U_\tau(so(4,2))$ can be unveiled by studying its Lie bialgebra structure,
that is, the first-order relations in the
deformation parameter, generators and dual coordinates. If we write the deformed coproduct
$\Delta$ as formal power series in $\tau$,
\beq
\Delta=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \Delta_{(k)}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}
\tau^k \delta_{(k)},
\eeq
the cocommutator $\delta$ is given by the skewsymmetric part of the first-order deformation,
\beq
\delta =\delta_{(1)} - \sigma\circ
\delta_{(1)},
\label{coco}
\eeq
where $\sigma(a\otimes b)=b\otimes a$. In our case, from (\ref{bc}) we find that
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
\delta(P_0)=0,\qquad \delta(P_i)=\tau P_i\wedge P_0,\\
\delta(J_i)=0,\qquad \delta(D)=-\tau D\wedge P_0,\\
\delta(K_i)=-\tau D\wedge P_i,\qquad \delta(C_0)=-\tau C_0\wedge P_0,\\
\delta(C_i)=-\tau C_i\wedge P_0+2\tau D\wedge K_i,
\end{array}
\label{cocob}
\eeq
where $\wedge$ denotes the skewsymmetric tensor product. Next,
Lie bialgebra duality \cite{Majid,CP} leads to the dual commutation rules in the form
\beq
\delta(Y_i)=f_i^{jk}Y_j\wedge Y_k \quad \Rightarrow\quad
[\hat y^j,\hat y^k]=f_i^{jk}\hat y^i ,
\label{dual}
\eeq
where $Y_i$ is a generic generator and $\hat y^i$ its associated dual quantum group coordinate
fulfilling
$\langle \hat y^i| Y_j\rangle= \delta_j^i$.
Therefore if we denote by $\{ \hat
x^\mu, \hat\theta^i,\hat\xi^i,\hat d,\hat c^\mu\} $ the dual non-commutative coordinates of the
generators $\{P_\mu,J_i,K_i,D,C_\mu\}$, respectively, we obtain from (\ref{cocob}) the
following non-vanishing first-order quantum group commutation rules:
\beq
\begin{array}{lll}
[\hat x^0,\hat x^i]=-\tau \hat x^i, &\qquad
[\hat x^0,\hat d]=\tau \hat d, &\qquad
[\hat x^0,\hat c^\mu]=\tau \hat c^\mu, \\[4pt]
[\hat d,\hat x^i]=-\tau \hat \xi^i, &\qquad
[\hat d,\hat \xi^i]=2 \tau \hat c^i . &
\end{array}
\label{bd}
\eeq
The non-commutative
Minkowskian spacetime is then characterized by
\beq
[\hat x^0,\hat x^i]=-\tau
\hat x^i,\qquad [\hat x^i,\hat x^j]=0,
\label{bbdd}
\eeq
which coincides with the usual $\kappa$-Minkowski space (\ref{aa}) with $a^\mu=(1,0,0,0)$,
provided that $\tau=-1/\kappa$. Nevertheless, in the
next section we shall compute the full (all orders) dual quantum group to $U_\tau({\cal WP})$,
and the associated
non-commutative spacetime will generalize the first-order relations (\ref{bbdd}).
We stress that all the above expressions can be rewritten in terms of deformed symmetries
of the $(4+1)$D AdS spacetime, $AdS^{4+1}$. Let $\adl_{AB}$ $(A<B)$ and $\tt_{A}$
($A,B=0,1\dots,4$) be the Lorentz and translations undeformed generators obeying
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
[\adl_{AB},\adl_{CD}]=\eta_{AC}\adl_{BD}-\eta_{AD}\adl_{BC}-\eta_{BC}\adl_{AD}
+\eta_{BD}\adl_{AC},\\[4pt]
[\adl_{AB},\tt_{C}]=\eta_{AC}\tt_{B}-\eta_{BC}\tt_{A},\qquad [\tt_A,\tt_B]=-\frac
1{\radio^2} \adl_{AB},
\end{array}
\label{be}
\eeq
such that $\eta=(\eta_{AB})={\rm diag}\,(-1,1,1,1,1)$ is the Lorentz metric
associated to $so(4,1)$, $\adl_{0B}$ are the four boosts in $AdS^{4+1}$ and $R$ is the AdS
radius related with the cosmological constant by
$\Lambda=6/R^2$.
Then the following change of basis ($i=1,2,3$):
\beq
\begin{array}{lll}
\tt_0=-\frac 1{2\radio} (C_0+P_0),&\quad \tt_1=\frac 1{ \radio}\, D,&\quad \tt_{i+1}=\frac
1{2\radio}(C_i+P_i),\\[4pt]
\adl_{01}=\frac 12 (C_0-P_0),&\quad \adl_{0,i+1}=K_{i},&\quad \adl_{1,i+1}=\frac
12(C_{i}-P_i),\\[4pt]
\adl_{23}=J_3,&\quad \adl_{24}=-J_2,&\quad \adl_{34}=J_1,
\end{array}
\label{bf}
\eeq
connects ${\cal CM}^{3+1}$ with $AdS^{4+1}$ and can be taken in the deformed case as a way to
identify (\ref{ba})--(\ref{bc}) as the quantum deformation $U_\tau(so(4,2))\equiv
U_\tau( AdS^{4+1})$.
The dual Lorentz ${\gadl}^{AB}$ and
spacetime ${\gtt}^A$ quantum AdS-coordinates can also be written in terms of
the conformal ones as
\beq
\begin{array}{lll}
\gtt^0=- R (\hat c^0+\hat x^0),&\quad \gtt^1=R\, \hat d,&\quad \gtt^{i+1}= R (\hat
c^{i}+\hat x^{i} ),\\[4pt]
\gadl^{01}=\hat c^0-\hat x^0 ,&\quad \gadl^{0,i+1}=\hat \xi^{i},&\quad \gadl^{1,i+1}=
\hat c^{i}-\hat x^{i} ,\\[4pt]
\gadl^{23}=\hat \theta^3,&\quad \gadl^{24}=-\hat \theta^2,&\quad \gadl^{34}=\hat
\theta^1 .
\end{array}
\label{bg}
\eeq
Hence the (first-order) non-vanishing commutation rules for the non-commutative $AdS^{4+1}$
spacetime turn out to be
\beq
[\gtt^0,\gtt^1]=- \tau R\,\gtt^1,\qquad
[\gtt^0,\gtt^{i+1}]=-\tau R^2 \gadl^{1,i+1},\qquad
[\gtt^1,\gtt^{i+1}]=-\tau R^2 \gadl^{0,i+1},
\label{bbgg}
\eeq
which involve both the boost $\gadl^{0,i+1}$ and the rotation $\gadl^{1,i+1}$ quantum
coordinates. A Lie bialgebra contraction analysis \cite{LBC} shows that the
contraction $R\to \infty$ from
$U_{\tau}( AdS^{4+1})$ and its dual to a
$(4+1)$D quantum Poincar\'e algebra/group is well defined whenever the deformation
parameter is transformed as $\tau\to \tau R^2$.
Therefore, the maps (\ref{bf}) and (\ref{bg}) can be used to express
the same quantum deformation of
$so(4,2)$ within two physically different
frameworks: $U_\tau( {\cal CM}^{3+1})\leftrightarrow U_{\tau}( AdS^{4+1})$. In fact, such
a quantum group relationship might further be applied in order to analyse the role that quantum
deformations of $so(4,2)$ could play in relation with the ``AdS-CFT correspondence" that
relates local QFT on
$AdS^{(d-1)+1}$ with a conformal QFT on the (compactified) Minkowskian
spacetime
${\cal CM}^{(d-2)+1}$ \cite{Maldacena, Witten,Reh} (in our case up to $d=5$).
We also remark that a more general (three-parameter) quantum deformation
of $o(3,2)$ can be found in \cite{Moz}, where the connection between the corresponding
quantum ${\cal CM}^{2+1}$ and $AdS^{3+1}$ algebras is explicitly described.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Quantum Weyl--Poincar\'e group}
The classical $r$-matrix associated to $U_\tau(so(4,2))$ reads
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
r=-\tau
D\wedge P_0\equiv \tau R^2\tt_1\wedge \tt_0+\tau R\, \tt_1\wedge
\adl_{01},
\end{array}
\label{bh}
\eeq
which satisfies the classical Yang-Baxter
equation \cite{Dr}. Therefore, $U_\tau(so(4,2))$ is a triangular (or
twisting) quantum deformation, different to the Drinfeld--Jimbo type, which
is supported by the Hopf subalgebra spanned by $\{D,P_0\}$. The
universal $\cal T$-matrix for the latter can be written as~\cite{Tmatrix}
\beq
{\cal T}={\rm e}^{\hat d D}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat x^0 P_0},
\label{t2}
\eeq
while the ${\cal R}$-matrix reads
\beq
\mathcal{R}=\exp(\tau P_0\otimes D) \exp (-\tau D\otimes P_0) .
\label{da}
\eeq
Since this element is also a universal ${\cal R}$-matrix for both $U_\tau({\cal
WP})\subset U_\tau(so(4,2))$ \cite{Herranz:2002fe}, the
corresponding dual quantum groups can be deduced explicitly by applying
the FRT procedure~\cite{Faddeev:ih}. This requires a matrix
representation $R$ for
(\ref{da}) as well as to choose a matrix element $T$ of the quantum group
with non-commutative entries. However, the consideration of the
complete
$U_\tau(so(4,2))$ structure (in both conformal and AdS bases) precludes a clear
identification of the non-commutative spacetime coordinates as these would appear
as arguments of functions that also depend on many other coordinates. In this
respect see, for instance, \cite{Chang} for the construction of a quantum AdS space
from a $q$-$SO(3,2)$ of Drinfeld--Jimbo type.
Since we are mainly interested in the structure and physical consequences of the associated
non-commutative spacetime coordinates (dual to the translation generators), we shall
consider here the FRT construction for the Weyl--Poincar\'e Hopf subalgebra in the
conformal basis.
A deformed matrix representation for the defining relations of $U_\tau({\cal WP})$
(\ref{ba}) can be obtained from the $6\times 6$ matrix representation of $AdS^{4+1}$; namely,
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
P_0=\f{\tau}{2} (e_{00}- e_{01}+ e_{10}-
e_{11})-e_{02}-e_{12}+e_{20}-e_{21},\\[4pt]
P_i=e_{0,i+2}+e_{1,i+2}+e_{i+2,0}-e_{i+2,1},\qquad D= e_{01}+e_{10},\\[4pt]
J_i=- \varepsilon_{ijk}\, e_{j+2,k+2} ,\qquad
K_i=e_{2,i+2}+e_{i+2,2},
\end{array}
\label{db}
\eeq
where $e_{ab}$ ($a,b=0,\dots,5$) is the matrix with entries $\delta_{ab}$.
We construct the quantum group element $T$ in such a representation by considering
the following matrix product, which is consistent with the exponential form of the
universal $\cal T$-matrix (\ref{t2}) for the carrier subalgebra $\{D,P_0\}$:
\beq
\begin{array}{ll}
{T}\!\!\! &={\rm e}^{\hat d D}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat x^0 P_0}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat x^1 P_1}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat x^2 P_2}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat x^3 P_3}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat \theta^1 J_1}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat \theta^2 J_2}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat \theta^3 J_3}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat \xi^1 K_1}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat \xi^2 K_2}
\,{\rm e}^{\hat \xi^3 K_3} \\[4pt]
& = \left(\begin{array}{cccccc}
\hat\alpha_+&\hat\beta_-&\hat\gamma_0&
\hat\gamma_1&\hat\gamma_2&\hat\gamma_3\\
\hat\beta_+&\hat\alpha_-&\hat\gamma_0&
\hat\gamma_1&\hat\gamma_2&\hat\gamma_3\\
\hat x^0&- \hat x^0&\hat\Lambda^0_0&
\hat\Lambda^0_1&\hat\Lambda^0_2&\hat\Lambda^0_3\\
\hat x^1&- \hat x^1&\hat\Lambda^1_0&
\hat\Lambda^1_1&\hat\Lambda^1_2&\hat\Lambda^1_3\\
\hat x^2&- \hat x^2&\hat\Lambda^2_0&
\hat\Lambda^2_1&\hat\Lambda^2_2&\hat\Lambda^2_3\\
\hat x^3&- \hat x^3&\hat\Lambda^3_0&
\hat\Lambda^3_1&\hat\Lambda^3_2&\hat\Lambda^3_3
\end{array}\right) ,
\end{array}
\label{dd}
\eeq
where the non-commutative entries are the quantum Minkowskian coordinates $\hat x^\mu$ and
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
\hat\alpha_\pm=\cosh\hat d\pm \frac 12{\rm e}^{\hat d}(\hat x_\mu\hat x^\mu
+\tau\hat x^0) ,\qquad \hat\gamma_\nu={\rm e}^{\hat d} \hat x_\mu
\hat \Lambda^\mu_\nu,\\[4pt]
\hat\beta_\pm=\sinh\hat d\pm \frac 12{\rm e}^{\hat d}(\hat x_\mu\hat x^\mu
+\tau\hat x^0) ,\qquad \hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu}
=\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu}(\theta^i,\xi^i),\\[4pt]
\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu} \hat\Lambda^\rho_{\sigma} g^{\nu\sigma}
=g^{\mu\rho},\qquad \hat x_\mu=g_{\mu\nu} \hat x^\nu,\qquad
(g^{\mu\rho})={\rm diag}\,(-1,1,1,1) .
\label{de}
\end{array}
\eeq
Note that quantum rotation and boost coordinates are jointly expressed through
the formal Lorentz entries $\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu}$.
The representation
(\ref{db}) gives rise to a quantum ${R}$-matrix
(\ref{da}) with dimension $36\times
36$. Since $P_0^3$ vanishes, ${R}$ reads
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
{R}=( \mbox{\boldmath $1$}\otimes \mbox{\boldmath $1$}+\tau P_0\otimes D
+\frac 12\tau^2 P_0^2\otimes D^2)
( \mbox{\boldmath $1$}\otimes \mbox{\boldmath $1$}-\tau D\otimes P_0
+\frac 12\tau^2 D^2\otimes P_0^2) ,
\end{array}
\label{df}
\eeq
where $\mbox{\boldmath $1$}$ is the $6\times 6$ unit
matrix. Next in pursuing the FRT program we impose that
\beq
{ R}{ T}_1{ T}_2={ T}_2{ T}_1{ R} ,
\label{dg}
\eeq
where ${ T}_1={ T}\otimes \mbox{\boldmath $1$}$ and ${
T}_2=\mbox{\boldmath
$1$}\otimes { T}$. This matrix equation provides the commutation rules among all the entries
in (\ref{dd}), which by taking into account (\ref{de}) can then be reduced to
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
[\hat d,\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu} ]=0,\qquad
[\hat x^\alpha,\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu} ]=0,\qquad
[\hat \Lambda^\alpha_{\beta},\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu} ]=0, \\[4pt]
[\hat d,\hat x^\mu]=\tau\left(
\delta^\mu_{0}{\rm e}^{-\hat d}-\hat \Lambda^\mu_{0} \right),\qquad
[\hat x^\mu , \hat x^\nu ] =\tau
\left(\hat \Lambda^\nu_{0}\hat x^\mu -
\hat \Lambda^\mu_{0} \hat x^\nu \right) ,
\end{array}
\label{dh}
\eeq
where the quantum Lorentz entries $\hat\Lambda^\mu_{0}$ are given by
\beq
\begin{array}{l}
\hat \Lambda^0_0=\cosh\hat\xi^1\cosh\hat\xi^2\cosh\hat\xi^3 ,
\qquad \hat\Lambda^2_0= \sinh\hat\xi^2\cosh\hat\xi^3 ,\\[4pt]
\hat\Lambda^1_0=\sinh\hat\xi^1\cosh\hat\xi^2\cosh\hat\xi^3 ,
\qquad \hat\Lambda^3_0= \sinh\hat\xi^3 .
\end{array}
\label{ffa}
\eeq
The coproduct for all the entries in ${ T}$ is just $\ds \Delta({
T})={ T}\dot\otimes { T}$. By using again (\ref{de}) the coproduct for $\{\hat d,\hat
x^\mu, \hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu} \}$ can consistently be found:
\beq
\Delta(\hat d)=\hat d\otimes 1+ 1\otimes \hat d,
\quad\ \Delta (\hat x^\mu)=\hat x^\mu \otimes {\rm e}^{-\hat d} +
\hat \Lambda^\mu_{\eta}\otimes \hat x^\eta
,\quad\ \Delta({\hat \Lambda^\mu_{\nu}})=
\hat \Lambda^\mu_{\eta} \otimes \hat \Lambda^\eta_{\nu},
\label{di}
\eeq
which is a homomorphism of (\ref{dh}).
Thus the expressions (\ref{dh})--(\ref{di})
together with the counit $\epsilon({ T})=
\mbox{\boldmath $1$}$ and antipode $S({ T})={
T}^{-1}$ determine
the Hopf algebra structure of the quantum Weyl--Poincar\'e group dual to $U_\tau({\cal
WP})$, which is the restriction $\hat c^\mu\equiv 0$ of that dual to $U_\tau( {\cal
CM}^{3+1})$.
We remark that the commutation relations (\ref{bd}) (with $\hat c^\mu\equiv 0$) can
be recovered from (\ref{dh}) by only taking the first-order in all the quantum
coordinates (notice that in this case,
$\hat \Lambda^0_0\to 1$ and $\hat\Lambda^i_0\to \hat\xi^i$).
Recall that the FRT approach was also used in the construction of the null-plane quantum
Poincar\'e group \cite{nullb}. However, as $\kappa$-Poincar\'e has no universal $\cal
R$-matrix, the associated quantum group was obtained \cite{Maslanka,Majid:1994cy,Zak,LukR}
through a direct quantization of the semiclassical Poisson--Lie algebra coming from the
$\kappa$-Poincar\'e classical $r$-matrix.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{A new non-commutative Minkowskian spacetime}
Now we focus our attention on some structural physical consequences of the new non-commutative
spacetime that comes out from (\ref{dh})
\beq
[\hat x^\mu , \hat x^\nu ] =\tau
\left(\hat \Lambda^\nu_{0}(\hat\xi) \hat x^\mu -
\hat \Lambda^\mu_{0}(\hat\xi) \hat x^\nu \right) ,
\label{fa}
\eeq
which can be seen as a generalization of (\ref{aa}) through $a^\mu\to \hat
\Lambda^\mu_{0}(\hat\xi)$.
Firstly, we stress that since $\hat \Lambda^\mu_{0}$ (\ref{ffa}) only depend on the quantum
boost parameters and the
quantum rotation coordiantes $\hat\theta^i$ do not play any role in the spacetime
non-commutativity, the isotropy of the space is thus preserved.
Furthermore, by taking into account the commutation rules (\ref{dh}),
$\hat \Lambda^\mu_{0}$ can be
considered to play the role of the structure
constants within the quantum space (\ref{fa}). In fact, the quantum boost coordinates $\hat\xi^i$ can
be regarded as scalars (usual commutative parameters) within the quantum
Weyl--Poincar\'e group. From this viewpoint, relations (\ref{fa}) would define a Lie algebraic
non-commutative spacetime of the type (\ref{aa}). However, this situation changes in the
full quantum conformal group since, as shown in (\ref{bd}),
$\hat\xi^i$ and $\hat \Lambda^\mu_{0}$ no longer commute with the dilation parameter $\hat
d$.
Secondly, relations (\ref{fa}) show that different observers in
relative motion with respect to quantum group transformations have a different perception of the
spacetime non-commutativity, {\em i.e.}, Lorentz invariance is lost. Nevertheless, we
remark that, in this context, covariance under quantum group transformations is ensured by
construction. Explicitly, in the
commutative case the $ T$-matrix (\ref{dd}) is just a matrix representation of the
transformation group of the spacetime, and the coproduct (\ref{di}) represents the
multiplication of two different elements of the group. A similar interpretation holds
in the quantum group case, for which (\ref{di}) provides the transformation
law for the non-commutative spacetime coordinates that can be rewritten as
\beq
\hat x''^\mu=\hat x^\mu \, {\rm e}^{-\hat d'} + \hat\Lambda^\mu_{\,\eta} \,
\hat x'^\eta ,
\label{fb}
\eeq
where the tensor product notation has been replaced by two different copies of the non-commutative
coordinates ($\hat x\otimes 1\equiv \hat x$, $1\otimes \hat
x\equiv\hat x'$). The fact that the spacetime (\ref{fa}) is quantum group covariant
is a direct consequence of the Hopf algebra structure which implies that
\beq
[\hat x''^\mu ,\hat x''^\nu ] =\tau \left ( \hat\Lambda''^\nu_{\ 0}(\hat\xi'') \hat
x''^\mu - \hat\Lambda''^\mu_{\ 0}(\hat\xi'') \hat x''^\mu \right) ,
\label{fc}
\eeq
where the new Lorentz entries are also given by (\ref{di}):
\beq
\hat\Lambda''^\mu_{\ \nu}(\hat\xi'')= \hat\Lambda^\mu_{\, \eta}(\hat\xi) \, \hat
\Lambda'^\eta_\nu (\hat\xi').
\label{fd}
\eeq
Therefore, if we assume that two ``observers" are actually related through a quantum group
transformation (\ref{fb}), they will be ``affected" by different structure constants for the
spacetime commutation rule (\ref{fa}), yet the latter is manifestly quantum group covariant.
In order to illustrate these results,
let us consider the $(1+1)$D case where the Lorentz sector
is expressed in terms of a single quantum boost parameter $\hat\xi\equiv \hat\xi^1$
as
\beq
(\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu})= \left (
\begin{array}{cc}
\cosh\hat\xi & \sinh\hat\xi\\
\sinh\hat\xi & \cosh\hat\xi
\end{array}
\right ) .
\label{fe}
\eeq
The transformation (\ref{fd}) shows directly the additivity of the quantum boost parameter
(along the same direction):
\beq
\hat\Lambda^0_0(\hat \xi'')=\cosh\hat\xi''=\Delta(\hat\Lambda^0_0)
=\cosh\hat\xi\otimes \cosh\hat\xi+\sinh\hat\xi\otimes \sinh\hat\xi
=\cosh(\hat\xi+\hat\xi'),
\label{ffe}
\eeq
and similarly for the remaining $\hat\Lambda^\mu_{\nu}$. The non-commutative
$(1+1)$D spacetime reads
\beq
[\hat x^1 ,\hat x^0 ] =\tau (\hat x^1 \cosh\hat \xi -\hat x^0 \sinh\hat
\xi ) ,
\label{ff}
\eeq
which implies the following uncertainty relation:
\beq
\delta \hat x^1\, \delta \hat x^0\geq \f{|\tau|}{2}
\left|\langle{\hat x^1}\rangle \cosh\hat \xi - \langle{\hat x^0}\rangle
\sinh\hat\xi \,\right|,\label{uncert}
\eeq
where $\delta$ denotes the root-mean-square deviation and
$\langle{\hat x^1}\rangle$, $\langle{\hat x^0}\rangle$ are the expectation values
of the space and time operators.
To end with, we also stress that if the following new space variables $\hat X^i$ in the
$(3+1)$D spacetime (\ref{fa}) are considered
\beq
\hat x^0 \rightarrow \hat x^0 ,
\qquad
\hat x^i \rightarrow \hat X^i=
\hat x^i\hat \Lambda^0_0-\hat x^0\hat\Lambda^i_0 ,
\eeq
the transformed commutation rules for the quantum spacetime are given by
\beq
[\hat X^i,\hat x^0]=\tau \hat\Lambda^0_0(\hat\xi)\hat X^i,\qquad [\hat X^i,\hat
X^j]=0,\label{newcoor}
\eeq
which, in turn, can be interpreted as a generalization of the $\kappa$-Minkowski space
(\ref{bbdd}) with a ``variable" Planck length $\tau'=\tau \hat\Lambda^0_0(\hat\xi)$ that does
depend on {\em all} the quantum boost parameters (in the $(1+1)$D case, this yields $\tau'=\tau
\cosh\hat\xi$). This result is a direct consequence of imposing a larger quantum group
symmetry than Poincar\'e. Moreover, if the quantum conformal transformations and
parameters are taken into account and the corresponding quantum
group is constructed, then $\hat \Lambda^0_0$ becomes a non-central operator in such a manner that
(\ref{newcoor}) (and also (\ref{fa})) defines a quadratic non-commutative spacetime. This suggests
that a further study of non-Lie spacetime algebras derived from conformal or AdS
quantum symmetries could be meaningful.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section*{Acknowledgements}
This work was partially supported by MCyT and JCyL, Spain
(Projects BFM2000-1055 and BU04/03), and by INFN-CICyT
(Italy-Spain).
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
{\footnotesize
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\bibitem{LukierskiRuegg1992} J.~Lukierski, A.~Nowicki,
H.~Ruegg, V.N.~Tolstoy,
Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 331.
\bibitem{Giller} S.~Giller, P.~Kosinski,
J.~Kunz, M.~Majewski, P.~Maslanka,
Phys. Lett. B 286 (1992) 57.
\bibitem{Lukierskib} J.~Lukierski, H.~Ruegg, A.~Nowicky,
Phys Lett. B {293} (1992) 344.
\bibitem{nulla}
A.~Ballesteros, F.J.~Herranz, M.A.~del Olmo, M.~Santander,
{Phys. Lett. B} {351} (1995) 137.
\bibitem{nullb}
A.~Ballesteros, F.J.~Herranz, C.M.~Pere\~na,
{Phys. Lett. B} {391} (1997) 71.
\bibitem{Majida}
S.~Majid, {Class. Quantum Grav.} {5} 1587 (1988).
\bibitem{Amelino-Camelia:2001xx}
G.~Amelino-Camelia,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B { 510} (2001) 255.
\bibitem{Amelino-Camelia:2000mn}
G.~Amelino-Camelia,
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ D {11} (2002) 35.
\bibitem{MagueijoSmolin}
J.~Magueijo, L.~Smolin,
Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~88 (2002) 190403.
\bibitem{Amelino-Camelia:2002vy}
G.~Amelino-Camelia,
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ D {11} (2002) 1643.
\bibitem{Kowalski-Glikman:2002we}
J.~Kowalski-Glikman, S.~Nowak,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {539} (2002) 126.
\bibitem{Bruno:primo}
N.R.~Bruno, G.~Amelino-Camelia, J.~Kowalski-Glikman, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {522} (2001) 133.
\bibitem{Bruno:2002wc}
N.R.~Bruno,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {547} (2002) 109.
\bibitem{Lukierski:2002df}
J.~Lukierski, A.~Nowicki,
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {18} (2003) 7.
\bibitem{Maslanka} P.~Maslanka, J.\ Phys.\ A {26} (1993) L1251.
\bibitem{Majid:1994cy}
S.~Majid, H.~Ruegg,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {334} (1994) 348.
\bibitem{Zak} S.~Zakrzewski, J.\ Phys.\ A {27} (1994) 2075.
\bibitem{LukR}
J.~Lukierski, H.~Ruegg,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {329} (1994) 189.
\bibitem{Amelino-Camelia:2002mu}
G.~Amelino-Camelia, M.~Arzano, L.~Doplicher,
hep-th/0205047.
\bibitem{Kowalski-Glikman:2002jr}
J.~Kowalski-Glikman, S.~Nowak,
Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ D {12} (2003) 299.
\bibitem{Lukierskid}
J.~Lukierski,V.D.~Lyakhovsky, M.~Mozrzymas,
{Phys. Lett. B} {538} (2002) 375.
\bibitem{Herranz:2002fe}
F.J.~Herranz,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {543} (2002) 89.
\bibitem{Ball}
A.~Ballesteros, N.R.~Bruno, F.J.~Herranz,
hep-th/0305033.
\bibitem{Majid}
S.~Majid, Foundations of Quantum Group Theory,
Cambridge Univ.\ Press, 1995.
\bibitem{CP} V.~Chari, A.~Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups,
Cambridge Univ.\ Press, 1994.
\bibitem{LBC} A.~Ballesteros, N.A.~Gromov, F.J.~Herranz, M.A.~del Olmo and M.~Santander,
J.~Math.~Phys. 36 (1995) 5916.
\bibitem{Maldacena}
J.~Maldacena,
Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {2} (1998) 231.
\bibitem{Witten}
E.~Witten,
Adv.\ Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\ {2} (1998) 253.
\bibitem{Reh}
K.-H.~Rehren, A proof of the AdS-CFT correspondence, in:
H.-D.~Doebner {\em et al} (Eds.), Quantum Theory
and Symmetries, World Scientific,
(2000) 278.
\bibitem{Moz}
J.~Lukierski,V.D.~Lyakhovsky, M.~Mozrzymas,
{Mod. Phys. Lett. A} {18} (2003) 753.
\bibitem{Dr} V.G.~Drinfeld, Sov.\ Math.\ Dokl.\ {27} (1983) 68.
\bibitem{Tmatrix} A.~Ballesteros, F.J.~Herranz, M.A.~del Olmo, C.M.~Pere\~na and
M.~Santander,
J.\ Phys.\ A {28} (1995) 7113.
\bibitem{Faddeev:ih}
L.D.~Faddeev, N.Y.~Reshetikhin, L.A.~Takhtajan,
Lengingrad Math.\ J.\ {1} (1990) 193.
\bibitem{Chang}
Z. Chang, {European Phys. J. C} { 17} (2000) 527.
\end{thebibliography}
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\end{document}