Classical Equation of Gravity to Quantum Limit
Extracted source text · arXiv math-ph/0009025
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META name="description" CONTENT="See equation for nuclear force, theory of quark confinements, unification of gravity derived logical and mathematical way a layman can understand, yet explaining everything.">
<META name="keywords" CONTENT="Nobel Prize, nuclear force, Einstein, unification, gravitation, quark, gluon, QCD, quantum, chromodynamics, Newton, strong force, CERN, supercollider, particle physics, Abdus Salam, Shanti, strong theory">
<META name="owner" CONTENT="Shantilal G. Goradia">
<META name="object" CONTENT="Document">
<TITLE>Classical Equation of Gravity to Quantum Limit</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgcolor="#ffffff" LINK="#0000ff">
<CENTER>
<TABLE width="85%">
<TR>
<TD>
<CENTER>
<FONT COLOR="#000099" FACE="Times New Roman"><H1>Classical Equation of Gravity<br>to Quantum Limit</H1></FONT>
<P ALIGN="center"><b><font size="+1">By Shantilal Goradia</font></b><i><br>
Senior Engineer,<br>
Nuclear Engineering Organization, American Electric Power<br>
Copyright © By Shantilal G. Goradia, August 21, 2000</i><br>
3003 Royal Huntsman Court<br>
South Bend, IN 46637-5044</P>
<P ALIGN="center"></P>
<P ALIGN="left"><b>Introduction:</b> The fact that mass
has an effect on surrounding space is the first essential element of
general relativity. This paper unifies this mass/space distinction of
general relativity with Newtonian gravity at a subatomic scale and with
reported experimental findings of the last century. The subatomic
distinction of mass concentration mainly in nucleons surrounded by empty
space as we know it now was not known when the general relativity was
written. The author uses this distinction to set forth a consistent
classical equation of gravity valid to the Planck length and peeps into
the quantum world. It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of
fundamental nuclear theory for the understanding of matter in the
universe and its cosmological evaluation, and also for the inclusion of
gravity in the unified family of all four forces.</P>
<P ALIGN="left">See equations <b>(1)</b> and <b>(2)</b>. The notation <b>D</b> in the denominator in Newtons equation <b>(1)</b> of the gravitational force denotes the separating distance between the centers of mass of the particles in question. Validity of equation <b>(1)</b> has been verified for distances as low as few centimeters. Its validity is not verified when subatomic separating distance between nuclei of atoms is a few femtometers (<b>fm's</b>). Newtons equation is an approximation that explains macroscopic observations. It does not express the measured force of attraction between nucleons at short range. My assertion is that its failure is a result of implicit assumption in Newtonian gravitys formation: that gravity originates at a point. Newtonian physics implies point masses and action between points. A point has no mass. I am asserting that, instead, the gravitation field originates at the surfaces of elementary particles, not at a central point within the elementary particles. The associated deviation from inverse square logic is insignificant and consistent with general relativity. The consequences of this distinction are enormous and unexplored. Newtons equation needs replacement by equation <b>(2)</b> for all microscopic distances. The correction is the injection of <b>d<SUB>n</SUB></b>. The notation <b>d<SUB>n</SUB></b> in Equation <b>(2)</b> is the diameter of the nucleons in
question.
Equation <b>(2)</b> is good for all distances greater than Planck Length <b>(10<SUP>-35</SUP> meters = 10<SUP>-20</SUP> fms)</b>. I require the Planck length as a lower bound so as to include the dominant, first order, quantum effect in this semi-classical model.</P>
<table WIDTH="65%"><tr>
<td width="20%">Newtonian</td>
<td width="65%"><STRONG>F<sub>N</sub> = Gm<SUB>1</SUB>x m<SUB>2</SUB> / D<SUP>2</SUP> </STRONG> </td><td width="15%"><STRONG>(1)</STRONG></td></tr>
<tr>
<td>Proposed</td>
<td><STRONG>F<sub>P</sub> = Gm<SUB>1</SUB>x m<SUB>2</SUB> / (D - d<SUB>n</SUB>)<SUP>2 </SUP></STRONG></td><td><STRONG>(2)</STRONG></td></tr></table>
<p align="left">The relative strength of the proposed equation is (2) divided by (1)</p>
<table WIDTH="65%"><tr>
<td width="20%">The Ratio</td><td width="65%"><b>F<sub>P</sub> / F<sub>N</sub> =
D<sup>2</sup> / (D - d<sub>n</sub>)<sup>2</sup></b></td><td width="15%"></td></tr>
</table>
<P><FONT color=#000099 size=4><STRONG>Strength of
Gravity at Short Range per equation (2) </STRONG></FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="left">When <STRONG>D </STRONG>is very large
compared to <STRONG>d<SUB>n</SUB>, D<SUP>2</SUP> </STRONG>is almost equal to <STRONG>(D-d<SUB>n</SUB> )<SUP>2</SUP></STRONG>.
The diameter of atoms is hundreds of millions of times greater than the
diameter of nucleons located at the center of atoms. The force of
gravitation calculated by these two equations between the nucleons of two
adjoining atoms is practically the same, because the ratio <STRONG> D<SUP>2</SUP> / (D-d<SUB>n</SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP> </STRONG>is almost equal to one. When <STRONG>D </STRONG>is small compared to <STRONG> d<SUB>n</SUB></STRONG>, the force of attraction calculated
by equation <STRONG>(2) </STRONG>will be significantly greater than that
calculated by equation <STRONG>(1)</STRONG>. The following results bring home the concept. </P>
<P ALIGN="left">If we call the force of gravitation
calculated by equation <STRONG>(1) "g"</STRONG>, the force of gravitation
calculated by equation <STRONG>(2) </STRONG>would be higher by the ratio
<STRONG>D<SUP>2</SUP> / (D - d<SUB>n</SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP> </STRONG>.
When <STRONG>D </STRONG>exceeds<STRONG> d<SUB>n</SUB></STRONG>, by Planck length <STRONG>(10<SUP>-20</SUP>fms)</STRONG>, the ratio: </P></CENTER></TD></TR></TABLE></CENTER>
<CENTER> </CENTER>
<DIV align=center>
<table width="95%"><tr>
<td width="15%"><b>D<SUP>2</SUP>/(D-d<SUB>n</SUB>)<SUP>2</SUP></b> </td><td width="53%"><STRONG>= (d<sub>n</sub> + Planck length)<SUP>2</SUP>/(Planck length)<SUP>2</SUP></STRONG></td><td width="32%">(All lengths in femtometers)</td></tr>
<tr><td></td>
<td>= <b>(1 + 10<SUP>-20</SUP>) / (10<SUP>-20</SUP>)<SUP>2</SUP></b></td> <td><b>(d<SUB>n</SUB>= 1 femtometer)</b></td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td><b>= 10<SUP>40</SUP></b></td></tr>
</table>
<table width="85%"><tr><td>
<P ALIGN="left">Multiplying this by
"<STRONG>g</STRONG>" to get the force of attraction between two nucleons
per equation <STRONG>(2), </STRONG>we get <STRONG> F<sub>P</sub>=10<SUP>40</SUP>g</STRONG></P>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099 size=4><STRONG>Comparison to
Observed Data</STRONG></FONT> </P>
<P ALIGN="left">The order of magnitude of the force
between two adjoining nucleons as derived from scattering experiments is
<STRONG> 10<SUP>40</SUP>g</STRONG> . No other formula predicts the short range strong force to any degree close to this prediction.</P>
<p align="left">Yukawa potential is too weak to explain the nuclear force. Also, the rest energy
of pion was predicted as 100 MeV based on range of the nuclear force
equal to one femtometer. The range of nuclear force is reported several
times higher depending upon which article one reads. Since the rest
energy of a particle is inversely proportional to the range of nuclear
force, the pion does not adequately describe the nuclear force. The
proposed equation explains the higher range of the nuclear force.</p>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099 size=4><STRONG>Natures
Intervention at Planck Length </STRONG></FONT> </P>
<P ALIGN="left">Nature guards against conversion of physical quantity to either zero or infinity in ways hard to verbalize. Accordingly, before the force of gravitational attraction between nucleon masses increases to infinity, Nature must be intervening at Planck length with its mysterious and quantum mechanical tools. </P>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099 size=4><STRONG>Quark Confinement</STRONG></FONT> </P>
<P ALIGN="left">This is an attempt for a qualitative explanation. The proposed equation can be looked as stating that the gravitational force between two particles is proportional to the mass effect divided by the space effect. In the absence of any space effect between quarks, the force between quarks is infinity-like. The mass effect between quarks increases with increasing separating distance between quarks, consistent with the camouflage effect of QCD.</P>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099 size=4><STRONG>Classical
Unification</STRONG></FONT> </P>
<P ALIGN="left">If equation <STRONG>(2) </STRONG>is
correct, then the nuclear force between nucleons which
is recognized as the secondary effect of the strong force (or resulting
from the leakage of the strong force) or color force between the quarks
is clearly at unity with gravity semi-classical way.</P>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099
size=4><STRONG>Prediction</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="left">The proposed equation predicts that at a surface to surface separation of 3 fm's and 4 fm's, the force of attraction between two nucleons would be 1.77 and 1.56 times the gravitational force for these distances respectively and gradually diminish to gravitational values at larger subatomic distances. There is no feature of nuclear
force that distinguishes it from gravitation. No experiment will find any distinguishing feature between the two. The range of the nuclear force is limited due to the accuracy with which miniscule gravitational forces between tiny nucleons can be measured. Higher accuracy will measure higher range. </P>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099
size=4><STRONG>Conclusion</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="left"><FONT size=3>Newtons equation of
gravitation is a macroscopic approximation. Equation <b>(2)</b> in the above text must be the general semi-classical equation of gravity for distances greater than Planck lengths. The nuclear force creates steep microscopic dents in the curvature of spacetime. <br><br>
Thanks are due to Dr. Zhang Benai, (Professor, Theoretical Physics and
Nuclear Science) of the Beijing Institute of Applied Physics and
Computational Mathematics for his comments during presentation of this
paper at the Nuclear Structure 2000 Conference at East Lansing, Michigan
in August 2000. Thanks are also due to Nobel Prize Winners, Steven
Weinberg and Ben Mottelson for answering my questions related to the
topic following their speeches at the Centennial Meeting of APS at
Atlanta, Georgia in March 1999. Thanks are due to all other
physicists who have commented on this topic.<br><br>
For questions and comments for further development of the theory, please E-mail the author at </FONT><A href="mailto:shantilalg@juno.com">shantilalg@juno.com</A>
</P>
<br>
<font size="+1"><b><i>Shantilal Goradia</i></b></font></div>
<P align=center><EM>Copyright © By Shantilal Goradia, August 21,
2000</EM></P>
<P align=center><FONT color=#000099
size=4><STRONG>References</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT size=3><b>1.</b>
Unification of Strong and Gravitational Forces.</FONT><br>
<FONT size=3> Copyright © By Shantilal G. Goradia, effective
04/08/99</FONT><br>
<FONT size=3> (Registration No. TXu
903-235)</FONT></P>
<CENTER></CENTER></td></tr></table></DIV></BODY>
</HTML>