Nucleon mean free path in nuclear matter based on nuclear Schwinger-Dyson formalism
Extracted source text ยท arXiv nucl-th/9507014
%Paper: nucl-th/9507014
%From: tomohiro MITSUMORI <94td21@cc.saga-u.ac.jp>
%Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 16:12:44 +0900
%Date (revised): Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:14:39 +0900
\documentstyle{article}
\begin{document}
\rightline{SAGA-HE-84-95}
\rightline{June 1995}
\centerline{{\bf Nucleon mean free path in nuclear matter based on
nuclear Schwinger-Dyson formalism }}
\centerline{Tomohiro MITSUMORI, Nobuo NODA,Kazuharu KOIDE }
\centerline{, Hiroaki KOUNO , Akira HASEGAWA}
\centerline{{\it Department of Physics, Saga University, Saga 840,
Japan}}
\centerline{~and}
\centerline{Masahiro NAKANO}
\centerline{{\it University of Occupational and Environmental
Health}}
\centerline{{\it Kitakyushu 807, Japan}}
{}~~~~~~~~~~~
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{\bf abstract}
A mean free path of nucleon moving through nuclear matter
with kinetic energy of more than 100MeV is formulated based on the bare
vertex nuclear Schwinger-Dyson (BNSD) method in the
Walecka model. The self-energy which is derived from the higher
order diagrams more than the forth order includes the Feynman part of
propagator of energetic nucleon and grows up rapidly as an increase of
kinetic energy.
To avoid too large growth of these diagrams, meson propagators are
modified by introducing some form factors
to take account of a internal structure of hadron.
It is confirmed that the mean
free path calculated by the BNSD method agrees good with experimental data
if a reasonable form factor is
chosen, i.e., a dipole (quadrupole) type
of form factor with a cut-off parameter about 750 MeV $\sim$ 1000 MeV
(1200 MeV $\sim$ 1500 MeV).
\vfill\eject
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{\bf 1. INTRODUCTION}
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The nucleon mean free path in nuclear medium is one of the important
quantity to show the property of nuclear matter as well as the binding energy
and the incompressibility etc.
It is experimentally extracted from the proton (or neutron)-nucleus total
cross sections for many targets at a spread of energy[1][2].
Recently there have been the numerical results of the nuclear
mean free path in nuclear matter
in the framework of relativistic approach based on the Dirac
phenomenology [3] , in the relativistic impulse approximation [4][5] and
in the density dependent Hartree-Fock approximation [6].In this paper
we evaluate the nucleon mean free path in nuclear matter in the $\sigma$-
$\omega$ model based on the nuclear Schwinger-Dyson formalism .
In the last several years ,the two loop correction and the ring-sum
correction were
calculated in the framework of renormalizable $\sigma -\omega$ model
and these contributions to the energy density are much in the Feynman part
and in the finite density part [7][8][9][10]. It is known that the large
contributions of the Feynman part
are reduced by introducing form factors at all vertex
in the loop diagram
[11][12] or by vertex corrections[13]. These procedures for reducing
short-range distance contributions are qualitatively acceptable at present
to take account of the internal structure of hadron.
By using the bare vertex nuclear Schwinger-Dyson (BNSD) method we showed
that the loop
corrections in the density part were also hardly reduced
because the these corrections
were strongly canceled among the contributions of three components
,i.e., $\sigma$- and $\omega$-mesons and $\sigma$-$\omega$ mixture
[14][15].
Until now we have studied about the saturation property of ground state
of nuclear matter
based on the BNSD method[14][15]. In these studies,
we determined two meson-nucleon
coupling constants to get the minimum energy at the normal density,
taking care to
remove the instability near the normal density by using some
recipes [16][17]. After this work, we studied
optical potentials for nucleon near Fermi surface under the BNSD
approximation
by using the results of
nuclear matter[17], and
we obtained the reasonable
optical potential both in the real and imaginary parts
compared with empirical findings
[18][19].
In this paper we estimate the mean free path of nucleon which
travels through nuclear matter having the kinetic energy of more than
100 MeV above the Fermi surface. We will show that an optical potential for
such a high energy nucleon outside the Fermi sphere is derived from the
Feynman part of self-energy which corresponds to the higher order
diagrams more
than the fourth-order, besides the density part of self-energy. These
higher order diagrams yield very large contributions to the optical potential
both in the real and imaginary parts as well as large contributions of the
Feynman part of energy density of nuclear matter. We point out that there
need meson propagators modified by introducing some form factors to make
the mean free path calculated by the BNSD method agree with ones
extracted in this kinetic energy region.
The organization of this paper is as follows. We develop the
BNSD method for a energetic
nucleon traveling far above the Fermi surface
in Sec. II.
The numerical results and discussion are shown in Sec. III.
We summarize our work of this paper in Sec.IV.
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{\bf 2. FORMULATION}
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We adopt the Walecka model[20] which consists of three fields, the
nucleon$\psi$,the scalar $\sigma$-meson $\phi$ and the vector
$\omega$-meson
$V_\mu$.The lagrangian density is given by
$$L = -\bar\psi(\gamma_\mu\partial_\mu +M)\psi -{1\over 2}(\partial_\mu
\phi\partial_\mu\phi +m_s^2 \phi^2) $$
$$ -({1 \over 4}F_{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}+{1 \over 2}m_v^2 V_\mu V_\mu)
+g_s\bar\psi\psi\phi +ig_v\bar\psi\gamma_\mu\psi V_\mu , \eqno(1) $$
\noindent
where $F_{\mu\nu}= \partial_\mu V_\nu - \partial_\nu V_\mu$ and $M$, $m_s$,
$m_v$, $g_s$ and $g_v$ are nucleon mass, $\sigma$-meson mass,
$\omega$-meson mass, $\sigma$-nucleon and $\omega$-nucleon
coupling-constants respectively.
The nucleon propagator is obtained by following form,
$$G(k) = G_F(k)+G_D(k) $$
$$= {-1 \over i\gamma_\mu k^*_\mu +M^*_k -i\epsilon}
+(-i\gamma_\mu k_\mu^* +M_k^* ){i\pi \over E^*_k}
\delta (k_0^* -E_k^* )\theta (k_F -|{\bf k}|),\eqno(2) $$
$$E_k^* =\sqrt{{\bf k}^{*2}+M_k^{*2}} , \eqno(3)$$
$$M_k^* =M+\Sigma_s(k) , \eqno(4)$$
$$k_\mu^* = ( {\bf k}^* , ik_0^* ) $$
$$=\biggr ( {\bf k} (1+\Sigma_v (k)),i(k_0 +\Sigma_0 (k)) \biggr )
, \eqno(5)$$
\noindent
where $G_F$ and $G_D$ are the Feynman part and
the density-dependent part, respectively.
The nucleon self-energy $\Sigma (k)$ is classified as shown in Fig.1
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Fig.1}}$}
$$\Sigma (k) = \Sigma_H (k) + \Sigma_{SDD}(k) + \Sigma_{SDF}(k) ,\eqno(6)$$
\noindent
where $\Sigma_H ,\Sigma_{SDD}$ and $\Sigma_{SDF}$ are the Hartree
term ,the SD density term and the SD Feynman term respectively.
And this nucleon self-energy is alternatively classified according to
the property of Lorentz transformation,
$$\Sigma = \Sigma_s (k)-\gamma_0 \Sigma_0 (k) +i \gamma_i \cdot
k_i \Sigma_v (k), \eqno(7)$$
\noindent
where $\Sigma_s ,\Sigma_0$ and $\Sigma_v$ mean the scalar component
,the timelike component of vector type and the spacelike component
of vector type.
In the BNSD method, the meson propagator satisfies the following
Dyson equation as shown in Fig.1,
$$D(q)=D_0 (q)+D_0(q)\Pi (q)D(q) , \eqno(8)$$
\noindent
where $D_0(q)$ denotes the free meson propagator and $\Pi (q)$
denotes the
meson self-energy.
Then the meson propagator has the real and the imaginary parts,
$$D(q) = Re D(q)+iIm D(q) . \eqno(9)$$
\noindent
To derive the imaginary part of self-energy we execute a Wick rotation
$q_0$ $\rightarrow$ $iq_0$ in the $q_0$-integral of the SD Feynman term
and rewrite $\Sigma_{SDF}$ as follows,
$$\Sigma_{SDF} = \Sigma_{SDF}^{on} + \Sigma_{SDF}^{off} ,
\eqno(10)$$
$$Re\Sigma_{SDF} = Re\Sigma_{SDF}^{on} + Re\Sigma_{SDF}^{off} ,
\eqno(11)$$
$$Im\Sigma_{SDF} = Im\Sigma_{SDF}^{on} .
\eqno(12)$$
\noindent
The superscripts "on" or "off" of $\Sigma_{SDF}$ denote that
the nucleon propagator included in the SD diagram is on-shell or
off-shell, respectively. We note that the real part of $\Sigma_{SDF}$
is composed of two terms, i.e., a finite term Re$\Sigma_{SDF}^{on}$
and an infinite term Re$\Sigma_{SDF}^{off}$, while the imaginary
part of $\Sigma_{SDF}$ is only one term, a finite
Im$\Sigma_{SDF}^{on}$. We drops the infinite real self-energy as
stated in the previous paper [17].
\noindent
We obtain the explicit expression of real
and imaginary nucleon self-energies corresponding to the Feynman diagrams
given in Fig.2 as follows,
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Fig.2}}$}
$$Re \Sigma_s (k) = -{2 \over \pi^2}{g_s^2 \over m_s^2}\rho_s-{g_s^2 \over
8\pi^2}\int_{0}^{k_F} q^2 {M^*_q \over E^*_q} dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx \Delta_0(R)
$$
$$ + {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{0}^{k_F} q^2{M^*_q \over E^*_q} dq
\int_{-1}^{1} dx 4 D_0 (R) $$
$$ + {g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
{M^*_q \over E^*_q} [{R^2 \over \vec R^2} (\Delta_0 \Pi_m D_m)_R
+(\Delta_0 \Pi_s D_s)_R] $$
$$ + {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
{M^*_q \over E^*_q} [ -4(D_0 \Pi_t D_t)_R +{ R^2 \over \vec R^2}\{
-(D_0 \Pi_l D_l)_R +(D_0 \Pi_t D_t)_R -{ R^2 \over \vec R^2}
(D_0 \Pi_m D_m)_R \} ] $$
$$ + {2 g_s g_v \over 8\pi^2}\int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 \int_{-1}^{1}dx
{ R^2 \over \vec R^2} Re D_m(R), \eqno(13a) $$
$$Im \Sigma_s (k) = {g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2}\int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 {M^*_q \over E^*_q}
dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx ImD_s(R) $$
$$ - {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2{M^*_q \over E^*_q} dq
\int_{-1}^{1} dx \{ 4ImD_l (R)+ (3+ {R_0^2 \over \vec R^2} )(ImD_t (R)-ImD_l
(R)) \} $$
$$ + {g_s g_v \over 4\pi^2}\int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx ImD_m (R) {
R^2 \over \vec R^2}, \eqno(13b)$$
$$Re \Sigma_0 (k) = -{2 \over \pi^2}{g_v^2 \over m_v^2}{k_F^3 \over 3}+{g_s^2
\over 8\pi^2} \int_{0}^{k_F} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx \Delta_0(R) $$
$$ + {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{0}^{k_F} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
2 D_0 (R) $$
$$ - {g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
[{R^2 \over \vec R^2} (\Delta_0 \Pi_m D_m)_R
+(\Delta_0 \Pi_s D_s)_R] $$
$$ + {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
[ -2(D_0 \Pi_t D_t)_R -{ R^2 \over \vec R^2}\{
-(D_0 \Pi_l D_l)_R +(D_0 \Pi_t D_t)_R -{ R^2 \over \vec R^2}
(D_0 \Pi_m D_m)_R \} ] $$
$$ - {2 g_s g_v \over 8\pi^2}\int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 \int_{-1}^{1}dx
{M^*_q \over E^*_q}{ R^2 \over \vec R^2} Re D_m(R), \eqno(14a)$$
$$Im \Sigma_0 (k) = -{g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx
ImD_s(R) $$
$$ - {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx \{ 2ImD_l
(R)+(2+{R^2 \over \vec R^2})(ImD_t (R)-ImD_l (R))\} $$
$$ - {g_s g_v \over 4\pi^2}\int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx {M_q^* \over
E_q^*}{ R^2 \over \vec R^2} ImD_m (R) , \eqno(14b) $$
$$Re \Sigma_v (k) = {g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2 k^2} \int_{0}^{k_F} q^2 dq
\int_{-1}^{1}dx
{q^* kx \over E_q^*} \Delta_0(R) $$
$$ + {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2 k^2} \int_{0}^{k_F} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
{q^* k x \over E_q^*} 2D_0 (R) $$
$$ - {g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2 k^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
{q^* k x \over E_q^*} [{R^2 \over \vec R^2} (\Delta_0 \Pi_m D_m)_R
+(\Delta_0 \Pi_s D_s)_R] $$
$$ + {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2 k^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx
{q^* k x \over E_q^*} [ -2(D_0 \Pi_t D_t)_R -{ R^2 \over \vec R^2}\{
-(D_0 \Pi_l D_l)_R +(D_0 \Pi_t D_t)_R -{ R^2 \over \vec R^2}
(D_0 \Pi_m D_m)_R \} ] \eqno(15a)$$
$$Im \Sigma_v (k) = -{g_s^2 \over 8\pi^2 k^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2
dq \int_{-1}^{1}dx { q^* kx \over E^*_q} ImD_s(R) $$
$$ - {g_v^2 \over 8\pi^2 k^2} \int_{k_F}^{k} q^2 dq \int_{-1}^{1} dx {q^* k x
\over E_q^*}\{ 2ImD_l (R) +(2-{R^2 \over \vec R^2})(ImD_t (R)-ImD_l (R))\},
\eqno(15b)$$
\noindent
where $R=k-q$, and $\rho_s$ and $\rho_B$ denote the scalar
and the baryon densities respectively, and $\Delta_0$ and $D_0$ denote the
free propagators of $\sigma$- and $\omega$-mesons, respectively.
The subscripts s,l,t and m of $D(R)$ and $\Pi (R)$ denote the component of
$\sigma$-meson, the longitudinal and transverse components of
$\omega$-meson and the component of mixture of $\sigma$- and
$\omega$-mesons,
respectively.
The detailed expressions of $D(R)$ are given in Ref.[16] and
the analytical expressions of $\Pi (R)$ are given in Ref.[10].
The last three terms in Eqs.(13a) and (14a) and the last two terms in Eq.(15a)
are contributed from the same higher order
diagrams which yield the imaginary part.
We modify the meson
propagators in the SD Feynman part of self-energy
by introducing some form factors
at the vertices in agreement with the point of view in Ref.
[11][12][21] to examine the short range
interactions and the finite size of hadrons ,as follows
$$D (q^2) \rightarrow [F(q^2)]^2 \cdot D(q^2), \eqno(16)$$
\noindent
where $F(q^2 )=1/[1+q^2 / \Lambda^2 ]^n$ . The case of n=1 is a
monopole type of
form factor and n=2 is a dipole type, etc.
Optical potentials are defined from self-energies $\Sigma$ as
$$U_S = {\Sigma_s - M\Sigma_v \over 1+\Sigma_v} = U_{SR} +iU_{SI},
\eqno(17) $$
$$ U_V = {-\Sigma_0 + E\Sigma_v \over 1+\Sigma_v} =
U_{VR} +iU_{VI}, \eqno(18) $$
\noindent
where $E$ is the energy of objective nucleon propagating with the
momentum $k$
satisfying the following dispersion relation,
$$E =\sqrt{ {\bf k}^2 +(M+U_S )^2 }+U_V . \eqno(19)$$
\noindent
Eq.(19) is rewritten as
$${ {\bf k}^2 \over 2M} +V+iW =E-M+{ (E-M)^2 \over 2M}, \eqno(20)$$
\noindent
with Schr$\ddot {\rm o}$dinger equivalent potential form
$$V = U_{SR}+U_{VR}+{ (E-M) \over M}U_{VR}+{1 \over 2M} (U_{SR}^2
+U_{VI}^2-U_{SI}^2-U_{VR}^2 ), \eqno(21) $$
$$W = U_{SI}+U_{VI}+{ (E-M) \over M}U_{VI}+{1 \over M}
(U_{SR}U_{SI}-U_{VR}U_{VI} ). \eqno(22) $$
\noindent
The nucleon momentum is complex as well as the optical potentials and
can be expressed as
$$ |{\bf k}| = k_R +ik_I . \eqno(23)$$
\noindent
and then we obtain the nucleon mean free path as follows,
$$\lambda ={1 \over 2k_I}$$
$$={1 \over 2}\Biggr \{ -M \biggr (E-M-V +{ (E-M)^2 \over 2M }\biggr )+M
\biggr[ \biggr (E-M-V +{ (E-M)^2 \over 2M }\biggr )^2 +W^2\biggr ]^{1/2} \Biggr
\}^{-1/2}. \eqno(24)$$
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{\bf 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION}
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In this section we calculate self-energies of the nucleon
propagating with the energy $E$ and the momentum ${\bf k}$ ,
convert them into the optical potentials
in the Schr$\ddot {\rm o}$dinger equivalent form , and evaluate the
nucleon mean free path from Eq.(24). The relation between
the energy $E$ and the momentum $k$ is given by approximating
Eq.(19) as follows,
$$E=\sqrt{{\bf k}^2 +(M+Re\Sigma_s (E,k))^2 }
-Re\Sigma_0 (E,k) .\eqno(25)$$
\noindent
The nucleon momentum ${\bf k}$, the upper limit of integral in the real and
imaginary
self-energy, is determined
from Eq.(25) by putting the nucleon energy $E=E_{in} +M$
,where $E_{in}$ is the nucleon incident energy.
In this paper we determine the coupling constants of the $\sigma$-nucleon and
$\omega$-nucleon
to satisfy the saturation property of nuclear matter at
the normal density $\rho$=0.170 fm$^{-3}$ ($k_F$ = 1.36 fm$^{-1}$)
, and 0.193 $fm^{-3}$ ($k_F$ = 1.42 $fm^{-1}$) and summarize the parameters in
Table.
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Table}}$}
Using these parameters (we choose the parameters in the case of
the normal density $\rho$=0.17 fm$^{-3}$ ),
we calculate the nucleon mean free path.
We start with evaluating the higher order diagrams more than the fourth
order in the nucleon self-energy shown in Fig.2.
Since these diagrams
include the Feynman propagator of nucleon on-shell in the intermediate
state,
we are afraid whether these diagrams give
a large contribution to the self-energy.
In Fig.3, we show contributions of $\sigma$-meson, $\omega$-meson
and $\sigma$-$\omega$ mixture to Re$\Sigma_s$ and Re$\Sigma_0$,
respectively. As the increase of kinetic energy of nucleon, $E-M$,
each component, $\Sigma^\sigma$, $\Sigma^\omega$ and
$\Sigma^{\sigma-\omega}$ , grows almost linearly, because the meson
propagator $\sim 1/q^2$ and the Jacobian $q^2$ factor
cancel each other in $q$-integrals
of self-energies with the upper limit of $k$.
In Re$\Sigma_s$, additive contributions of $\sigma$-meson and
$\sigma$-$\omega$ mixture cancel strongly with the
one of
$\omega$-meson and as a result the net contribution is small.
On the
other hand, contributions of three components to Re$\Sigma_0$ are
all additive and as a result the self-energy is very huge
and the net contribution
becomes nearly equal with the Hartree contribution.
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Fig.3(a) , Fig.3(b) }}$}
In Fig.4, we also show the contributions of three components to
Im$\Sigma_s$
and Im$\Sigma_0$, respectively.
The contributions of
$\sigma$-meson and $\sigma$-$\omega$ mixture to Im$\Sigma_0$
are far smaller than
the one of $\omega$-meson.
The
$\omega$-meson dominance should be marked. The value of Im$\Sigma_0$
at $E-M = 200 MeV$ are considerably reduced in comparison with the one
derived from the
fourth order diagrams in Ref.[21].
The higher order contribution more than the fourth order is very important
[17].
The value of Im$\Sigma_s$
is also reduced at the
same kinetic energy and, however, has the negative sign
when $E-M$ $>$ $350 MeV$, which is
opposite to the sign of Im$\Sigma_s$ obtained from the fourth order
diagram.
The change of sign is easily understood from Fig.4(b).
In lower kinetic energy region Im$\Sigma_s$ is positive because
the contribution of $\omega$ meson is large and positive
compared with the small and negative contributions of others.
On the other hand, in higher kinetic energy region, the sign of
Im$\Sigma_s$ changes to the negative one because the contribution of
$\omega$ meson changes to the negative one and becomes large.
It should be remarked that Im$\Sigma$ originates from the Feynman
part of self-energy. So, although Im$\Sigma$ is small if
$E-M$ $<$ $100 MeV$,
it grows up unphysically
if $E-M$ $>$ $100 MeV$ as well as the vacuum effect
for the energy density in nuclear matter
is unphysically large. Then, we introduce form
factors into each vertex by modifying meson propagators,
$D(q) \rightarrow [f(q^2)]^2\cdot D(q)$ as shown in Ref.[21].
It is noted that, since the SD diagrams are composed of full meson propagators
with
a ring-sum correction, a dipole (quadrupole) type of form factor
introduced into the SD diagram corresponds to a monopole (dipole) type
of form factor into the fourth order diagram.
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Fig.4(a) , Fig.4(b) }}$}
There are two kinds of $\Sigma_{SDF}$ leading to the real
self-energy.
One is the above-discussed self-energy derived from the same diagram
which yields the imaginary part. The other is the self-energy derived
from the
diagrams including the Feynman propagator of nucleon off-shell.
The renormalization procedure showed that Re$\Sigma_{SDF}$ is
very large.
So we must develop
a new recipe which takes account of the size of hadron.
Then, we should evaluate the two diagrams at the same
time when we want to know their contributions to the real
self-energy. In the present situation, therefore, we do not pick
up both of them though we are afraid of the violation of the
dispersion relation between the real part and the imaginary part.
In Fig.5(a) and (b), we show the imaginary part and the real part of
Schr$\ddot {\rm o}$dinger equivalent potentials
, in cases of two types of form factor, the dipole with $\Lambda$
= 750 (solid curve), 1000 (dotted curve) and 1500 MeV (dashed curve)
and the quadrupole with $\Lambda$ = 1200 (bold solid curve) and
1500 MeV (bold dotted curve). The solid dots are empirical information
[18][19].
As the kinetic energy increases, the imaginary potential decreases slowly
if $E-M$ $<$ $300 MeV$ and rapidly if $E-M$ $>$ $350 MeV$.
This feature is particularly in character with the dashed curve which
is closer to the one without the form factor.
The reason is as follows. In the rough, the imaginary potential is
proportional to Im$\Sigma_s$ $-$ Im$\Sigma_0$ and Im$\Sigma_s$ changes
from positive sign to negative sign at $E-M$ $\simeq$ $350 MeV$.
The numerical data of the dipole type
of form factor with $\Lambda$ = 750 MeV almost correspond to the data
of the quadrupole type with $\Lambda$ = 1200 MeV. Similarly,
the dipole type with $\Lambda$ = 1000 MeV corresponds to
the quadrupole type with $\Lambda$ = 1500 MeV.
Our numerical results are a little
different from empirical information in the
tendency in the low kinetic energy region.
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Fig.5(a) , Fig.5(b) }}$}
The nucleon mean free path is written by using
Schr$\ddot {\rm o}$dinger equivalent potential form
as given by Eq.(24).
In Fig.6 we show the mean free path in the cases of some form
factors.
When we choose the dipole type of form factor with
cut off $\Lambda$=750 MeV
and the quadrupole type of one with $\Lambda$=1200 MeV
, the values of mean free
path are good agreement with the experimental ones, but the experimental
data are extracted from the reaction of proton and nuclei and so
we consider that the reasonable form factor is the dipole type with
$\Lambda$ $\simeq$ 750 $\sim$ 1000 MeV or the quadrupole type with
$\Lambda$ $\simeq$ 1200 $\sim$ 1500 MeV for nuclear matter.
\centerline{$\underline{\overline{\rm Fig.6 }}$}
Furthermore, we calculated the similar calculations using coupling constants
determined at the normal density
$\rho$=0.193 ($k_F$=1.42 fm$^{-1}$),
but the results were nearly equal.
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{\bf 4. SUMMARY}
{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We evaluated the nucleon mean free path of the energetic nucleon
based on the BNSD method and compare it with the ones
extracted experimentally [1], and took a good agreement in the case of
modification of meson propagators by introducing dipole type
of form factor
$\Lambda$ = 750 MeV $\sim$ 1000 MeV and quadrupole type with
$\Lambda$ = 1200 MeV $\sim$ 1500 MeV. We confirmed that the BNSD
method was useful for the derivation of optical potential for a
nucleon traveling far above the Fermi surface
if we consider the finite size of nucleon or some effects of the
short-range corrections of nuclear force.
The real self-energy Re$\Sigma^{on}_{SDF}$ grows unphysically
as the increase of kinetic energy. Even if it can be reasonably
reduced by modifying meson propagators, the residual Feynman
self-energy Re$\Sigma^{off}_{SDF}$ is expected also very large.
We assure again the conclusion discussed in the previous paper [17]
that we do not pick up Re$\Sigma^{on}_{SDF}$ when we drop out
Re$\Sigma^{off}_{SDF}$. On the other hand the imaginary part
of $\Sigma_{SDF}$ is only Im$\Sigma^{on}_{SDF}$.
The cut off parameter of form factor introduced
into Im$\Sigma_{SDF}^{on}$
looks somewhat small but reasonable
when we regard this parameter as a parameter of nucleon size.
The real part of optical potential in the
Schr$\ddot {\rm o}$dinger equivalent form increases
linearly as the increase of kinetic energy, keeping a good agreement
with the experimental findings in the lower kinetic energy.
There remains a problem
in the imaginary part of optical potential
that its magnitude is too small
in the lower kinetic energy region when a form factor is chosen to
obtain the experimental data of mean free path in the higher kinetic
energy region.
In our previous work and this work, we took account of
the vacuum part of meson self-energy with the low 4-momentum transfer
to remove a instability around the normal density.
The vacuum part of meson self-energy is also inserted into the
denominator of the meson propagator in the integral of
Im$\Sigma_{SDF}^{on}$. The vacuum part in this case has the high 4-momentum
transfer and so is expected too much.
As our next
work, we will study the role of the vacuum effect for meson
self-energy in the imaginary potential.
\centerline{{\bf Acknowledgment }}
The authors are grateful to Prof. T.Kohmura,
and N.Kakuta for useful discussion, and to the members of nuclear theorist
group in Kyushyu district in Japan for their continuous encouragement.
The authors also gratefully acknowledgement the computing time granted by
Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP).
\vfill\eject
\centerline{{\bf References}}
\noindent
[1]P.U.Renberg, D.F.Measday, P.Pepin, P.Schwaller, B.Favier
and C.Richard-Serre,
~~Nucl.Phys. {\bf A183}(1972)81.
\noindent
[2]B.C.Clark, E.D.Cooper, S.Hama, R.W.Finlay and T.A.Adami,
~~Phys. Lett. {\bf B229}(1993)189.
\noindent
[3]E.D.Cooper, S.Hama, B.C.Clark and R.L.Mercer,
Phys.Rev.{\bf C47}(1993)297.
\noindent
[4]T.Cheon, Phys. Rev. {\bf C38}(1988)1516.
\noindent
[5]R.A.Rego, Phys.Rev. {\bf C44}(1991)1944.
\noindent
[6]G.Q.Li and R.Machleidt, Phys. Rev. {\bf C48}(1993)1062,
\noindent
{}~G.Q.Li, R.Machleidt, R.Fritz, H.M$\ddot {\rm u}$lher and Y.Z.Zhuo,
Phys. Rev. {\bf 48}(1993)2443.
\noindent
[7]C.Bedau and F.Beck, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A560}(1993)518.
\noindent
[8]X.JI, Phys.Lett. {\bf B208}(1988)19.
\noindent
[9]R.Furnsthl, R.J.Perry and B.D.Serot, Phys. Rev. {\bf C40}(1990)321.
\noindent
[10]K.Lim, Ph.D.Thesis in the Dept.of Phys. Indiana Univ.(1990),
\noindent
{}~K.Lim, and C.J.Horwitz, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A501}(1989)729.
\noindent
[11]M.Prakash, P.J.Ellis and J.I.Kapusta, Phys. Rev. {\bf C45}(1992)2518.
\noindent
[12]J.A.MacNeil, C.E.Price and J.R.Shepard, Phys. Rev. {\bf C47}(1993)1534.
\noindent
[13]M.P.Allends and B.D.Serot, Phys.Rev. {\bf C45}(1992)2975.
\noindent
[14]M.Nakano, A.Hasegawa, H.Kouno and K.Koide,Phys.Rev.{\bf C49}(1994)3076.
\noindent
[15]M.Nakano, K.Koide, T.Mitsumori, M.Muraki, H.Kouno and A.Hasegawa,
Phys.Rev.
~~{\bf C49}(1994)3076.
\noindent
[16]A.Hasegawa, K.Koide, T.Mitsumori, M.Muraki, H.Kouno and M.Nakano,
~~Prog.Theor.Phys.{\bf 92}(1994)331.
\noindent
[17]A.Hasegawa, T.Mitsumori, M.Muraki, K.Koide, H.Kouno and M.Nakano,
~~Prog.Theor.Phys.{\bf 93}(1995)757.
\noindent
[18]B.Friedman and V.R.Pandharipande,Phys.Lett.{\bf 100B}(1981)205.
\noindent
[19]C.Mahaux and N.Ng$\hat {\rm o}$,Phys.Lett.{\bf 100B}(1981)285.
\noindent
[20]J.D.Walecka,Ann. of Phys.{\bf 83}(1974)491.
\noindent
[21]C,J,Horowitz, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A412}(1984)228.
\vfill\eject
\centerline{{\bf Table and Figure captions}}
\noindent
Table~~~Baryon density (in $fm^{-3}$), coupling constants,
$\sigma$ and $\omega$ meson masses (in MeV) in
our calculation.
\noindent
Fig.1~~~Feynman diagrams for the calculation of scattering problem
based on BNSD
method. Double solid (dotted) lines represent
exact nucleon(meson)
propagators, and single solid(dotted)
lines represent free ones.
\noindent
Fig.2~~~Feynman diagrams for the calculation of the self-energy. (a)Hartree
diagram, (b)Fock diagram, (c) Higher order diagram more
than fourth order.
Doubly downward lines denote the hole
states with momenta under the Fermi momentum $k_F$
and the doubly
upward lines denote the intermediate states with momenta $\le k$.
\noindent
Fig.3~~~The real part of nucleon self-energy extracted from
Feynman propagator of nucleon on-shell. (a) The component
of scalar part and (b) the component of vector part.
\noindent
Fig.4~~~The imaginary part of nucleon self-energy extracted from
Feynman propagator of nucleon on-shell.
(a) The component of vector part and
(b) the component of scalar part.
\noindent
Fig.5~~~Optical potential in the
Schr$\ddot {\rm o}$dinger equivalent form. (a)
The imaginary part
and (b) the real part.
\noindent
Fig.6~~~The nucleon mean free path in nuclear matter. The solid dots with
error bars
are experimental results from Ref.[1].
\Large
\centerline{Table}
{}~~~
{}~~~
{}~~~~~
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\(\rho_B \)& \(m_s\)&\(m_v\)&\(g_s\) &\(g_v\) \\ \hline\hline
0.170& 550 &783 & 9.59 & 11.67 \\ \hline
0.192& 550 &783 & 9.12 & 11.00 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{document}