Superdeformed Bands of Odd Nuclei in A=190 Region in the Quasiparticle Picture
Extracted source text ยท arXiv nucl-th/9606048
\documentstyle[psfig,12pt]{article}
\textwidth=17cm
\textheight=24cm
\hoffset=-2cm
\voffset=-2cm
\begin{document}
\baselineskip=15pt
%
\title{ Superdeformed Bands of Odd
Nuclei in $A$=190 Region in the Quasiparticle Picture
}
\author{
J.~Terasaki, H.~Flocard \\
Division de Physique Th\'eorique\thanks{Unit\'e de recherches des
Universit\'es Paris XI et Paris VI associ\'ee au CNRS.},
Institut de Physique Nucl\'eaire, \\
91406 Orsay Cedex, France
\and
P.-H.~Heenen\thanks{Directeur de Recherches FNRS.} \\
Service de Physique Nucl\'eaire Th\'eorique,\\
U.L.B.-C.P.229, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
\and
P.~Bonche \\
SPhT
\thanks{Laboratoire de la DSM} -CE Saclay, 91191
Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France }
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
We study the properties of the superdeformed (SD) bands of $^{195}$Pb
and
$^{193}$Hg by the cranked Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method.
%
Our calculations reproduce the flat behavior
of the dynamical moment of inertia
of two of the SD bands of $^{195}$Pb measured recently.
%
We discuss possible configuration
assignments for the observed
bands 3 and 4 of $^{195}$Pb.
%
We also calculate the two interacting SD bands of $^{193}$Hg.
%
Our analysis confirms
the superiority of a density-dependent pairing force
over a seniority pairing interaction.
\end{abstract}
The
dynamical moment of inertia $\cal J$ of most superdeformed (SD) bands
observed in nuclei of the $A \simeq$ 190 region
are increasing functions of the angular velocity
$\omega$\cite{ Vo93,Dr91,
Ca90,Fa95,Jo94,Ce94,Fe90,Az91,Az91b,Hu,Hu94,Far95,Wa91,Cl95}.
%
The recent discovery by Farris et al.,\cite{Far95}
that for the two lowest SD
bands in $^{195}$Pb, $\cal J$ is almost constant versus $\omega$
is therefore particularly interesting.
%
In the same nucleus two other bands have been observed
which display the usual increasing trend.
%
It appears natural to attempt an explanation of these various
behaviors of the SD bands of $^{195}$Pb
in terms of their quasiparticle (qp) structure.
%
According to most theoretical investigations of the $A=190$ region,
the neutron qp's which are relevant for neutron numbers
above the $N=112$ gap are built on the
[752]5/2, [512]5/2 and [624]9/2 orbitals\cite{Wy95,Gi94,Sa91,Ga94}.
%
In this letter, we analyze the properties of the
SD bands of the two odd-$N$ neighbouring nuclei $^{195}$Pb
and $^{193}$Hg \cite{Jo94} which today provide the richest information
set on the neutron structure in the $A=190$ superdeformed well.
%
Our work is based on the cranked Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB)
approach
which has been shown to reproduce with good accuracy the
SD band properties of even nuclei\cite{Bo96,Te95}.
%
As in
ref.~\cite{Ga94}, the mean-field method has been corrected by means of
the Lipkin-Nogami prescription\cite{Li60,No64,Pr73}
to take into account the finite number of nucleons.
%
The nucleon-nucleon effective interaction in the particle-hole channel
is the Skyrme force within the Skm$^*$ parametrization\cite{Ba82}.
%
In the pairing channel we use a zero-range force with a
surface-peaked density dependence as described in ref.\cite{Te95}.
%
In a previous study
of the yrast SD band of $^{194}$Pb, this type of
force was shown to improve significantly the alignment
properties which determine the saturation of $\cal J$
for large values of $\omega$.
%
Our method of solution of the HFB equation combines the
imaginary-time evolution method to determine the basis
which diagonalizes the mean-field hamiltonian and
a diagonalization of the HFB hamiltonian matrix
to construct the canonical basis.
%
Details are available in ref.\cite{Ga94}.
%
The different bands of the odd nuclei we are concerned with, are
described
by the self-consistent creation of the appropriate qp \cite{He95} on
the even vacuum.
%
This requires some care in the numerical treatment, since, except at
zero angular velocity, parity and
signature are the only quantum numbers available
for sorting qp's.
%
Therefore, we rely mostly on
continuity properties versus $\omega$ to follow a given SD band.
%
%
The first part of this letter is devoted to a study of $\cal J$ and qp
routhian (qpr)
properties of $^{195}$Pb.
%
In the second part we analyze how the structure of
the pairing force affects SD properties by comparing the results
for $^{193}$Hg with the density dependent interaction
with those of ref.\cite{He95} in which
a seniority interaction was used.
%
In Fig.~1 we compare the dynamical
moments of inertia $\cal J$ of the four observed
bands\cite{Far95} with those calculated for the seven
SD bands built on
the [752]5/2,$\alpha$=$\pm$1/2, [512]5/2,$\alpha$=$\pm$1/2,
[624]9/2,$\alpha$=$\pm$1/2 and [642]3/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 orbitals.
%
The SD bands built on the intruder
$\nu$[752]5/2 bands display a small variation of $\cal J$ for
$\hbar\omega$ $\geq$ 0.24 MeV.
%
It seems therefore reasonable
to assign them to the first and second experimental
bands.
%
The observed significant signature splitting is also reproduced and
suggest that the band with lowest moment of inertia has a positive
signature.
%
For bands 3 and 4 the authors of ref.\cite{Far95} have
argued that they may be built on $\nu$[624]9/2 orbitals.
%
On the other hand, the theoretical part of their analysis
indicated that transition energies associated with
$\nu$[624]9/2 and $\nu$[512]5/2 bands would be almost identical.
%
This is supported by our
results.
%
Indeed we find that the moment of inertia of the $\nu$[624]9/2 bands
is very similar to that of
the $\nu$[512]5/2 bands for $\hbar\omega$ $\geq$ 0.24 MeV.
%
Both sets of $\cal J$ agree qualitatively with those observed
for bands 3 and 4.
%
Based on the sole information given by the moment of inertia,
it is therefore not possible to decide
whether bands 3 and 4
should be labeled $\nu$[624]9/2 or $\nu$[512]5/2.
%
We only note a small signature splitting for the $\nu$[512]5/2 when
$\hbar\omega$ $\geq$ 0.3 MeV
%
A complementary piece of information
is provided by the excitation
energy $E_{\rm rel}$ of the bands with respect to each other.
%
It is generally believed that
this quantity which is directly available in the
calculation (see Table~1) is correlated with
the observed relative population of the bands.
%
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\hline
band & $E_{\rm rel}$ [MeV] \\
\hline
$\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$=$+$1/2 & 0.125 \\
$\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 & 0.000 \\
$\nu$[512]5/2, $\alpha$=$+$1/2 & 0.168 \\
$\nu$[512]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 & 0.172 \\
$\nu$[624]9/2, $\alpha$=$+$1/2 & 0.297 \\
$\nu$[624]9/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 & 0.297 \\
$\nu$[642]3/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 & 0.368 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Calculated relative excitation energies $E_{\rm rel}$ of
the six SD bands in $^{195}$Pb at $I$ = 32.5.
%
The reference band is $\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 band.
%
$E_{\rm rel}$ of the negative-signature bands were calculated from
averages of energies of $I$ = 31.5 and 33.5.}
\end{table}
%
In Table~1, the reference energy
corresponds to the state of $\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 band
of the angular momentum $I$ = 32.5, which was calculated by
averaging two energies of $I$ = 31.5 and 33.5.
%
$E_{\rm rel}$ of the other negative-signature bands
were calculated in the same way.
%
According to Table~1, the $\nu$[752]5/2 bands are the lowest,
the $\nu$[512]5/2 bands are second lowest and
the $\nu$[624]9/2 bands are the most excited.
%
Therefore, for the $\nu$[752]5/2 bands, the
agreement of our calculation with experiment
concerns both the magnitude and behavior of moments
of inertia and the excitation energy.
%
On the other hand, we would be
led to assign a $\nu$[512]5/2 structure to bands 3 and 4.
%
We note however that the energy differences in Table~1 are
of the order of 0.1MeV.
%
Such a precision could well be below
the limit of physical credibility of a calculation such as ours
when it comes to the relative position of orbitals.
%
We shall return to this point
when discussing the crossing phenomenon in $^{193}$Hg.
The charge quadrupole moments $Q_{\rm c}$
of the $\nu$[512]5/2 and $\nu$[624]9/2 bands
are shown in Fig.~2.
They differ by approximately 0.3b
which is
probably too small to be measured.
%
As expected for bands with large $m$ values
no signature splitting is found.
%
The quadrupole moments of the intruder bands are
more different: 19.96 eb at $I$ = 32.5 ($\hbar\omega$ = 0.314MeV )
for $\alpha=+1/2$ and 19.47 eb at $I$ = 31.5
( $\hbar\omega$ = 0.290MeV )
for its signature partner.
%
Differences between the magnetic moments of the
$\nu$[512]5/2 and $\nu$[624]9/2 bands
would lead to different crosstalks
between the bands.
%
However their values are rather similar (
$\simeq$ 12.4 $e\hbar/2M_{\rm p}c$ at $I$ $\simeq$ 31, $M_{\rm p}$
being the
proton mass )
for the four bands.
They therefore also do not provide a convenient signature to
establish the nature of the 3rd and 4th SD bands.
Let us now consider the evolution versus $\omega$
of the qpr's. Because the mean-fields are self-consistently
modified by the creation of a qp, they are not the same
for the six SD bands and differ also from those
calculated for $^{194}$Pb.
%
In Fig.\ 3 and 4 we show the neutron qpr's for the $\nu$[752]5/2,
$\alpha$ = $-$1/2
( after a crossing with [512]5/2,$\alpha$=$-$1/2 )
and $\nu$[624]9/2, $\alpha$ = +1/2 bands
respectively.
%
In each figure, the thick curve indicates which qp is
occupied.
%
One sees that the difference between the occupied and empty qpr's
of the signature partners is large for all values of the rotational
frequency.
%
This is caused by the modification of the time-odd components
of the mean-field that is generated by the occupation of
only one of the signature partner ;
in particular one notes that the difference does not vanish
at $\omega$ = 0.
%
Figs.\ 3 and 4 show that the flat $\cal J$ behavior
for the $\nu$[752]5/2
bands is strongly correlated with the curvature of the associated
routhians which is markedly different from
those of other qpr's.
%
Moreover, the fact that the average curvature of the
$\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$ = $+$1/2 routhian is
the smallest, is consistent
with the low moment of inertia of the corresponding band.
%
The accident in the theoretical $\cal J$ for
the [752]5/2 and [512]5/2 bands
for $0.1$MeV$\leq\hbar\omega\leq$0.2MeV
is generated by a band crossing.
%
Such an accident can always
happen when two crossing bands have the same quantum numbers.
%
In case of a band crossing, our convention is to denote bands with
the qp configuration which characterizes them for
large values of $\hbar\omega$.
%
For values of $\hbar\omega$ near 0.15 MeV,
both for the $\nu$[752]5/2 and $\nu$[512]5/2 bands,
we have not been able to
obtain solutions satisfying the angular-momentum constraint
accurately.
%
Indeed, we have met numerical instabilities
caused by the near degeneracy both in energy
and angular momentum.
%
A correct physical solution of this problem
requires a self-consistent configuration mixing calculation
which is beyond the scope of this study.
%
As a band crossing has not been observed in $^{195}$Pb,
we infer that the calculation shown in Fig.~3
overestimates the energy difference between the $\nu$[752]5/2,
$\alpha$=$-$1/2
and $\nu$[512]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 energies at $\omega=0$
by at least 0.1MeV.
%
One way to remedy this deficiency,
would be to correct the mean-field in such a way that
the energy of the $\nu$[512]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2
is pushed up, leading to a crossing below the lowest observed
$\hbar\omega$.
%
According to the above discussion,
the associated excitation
energy of the $\nu$[512]5/2 SD bands
would increase and possibly modify our assignation for band 3 and 4,
leading us to agree with the conclusions of ref.\cite{Far95}.
We should also mention the relative position of $\nu$[624]9/2,
$\alpha$=+1/2
in Fig.~4.
%
The qpr is not the lowest in routhians having the positive parity and
positive signature.
%
It is anticipated, however, that a particle-type qpr ($\nu$[624]9/2)
becomes lower than a hole-type one ($\nu$[642]3/2) in $^{195}$Pb, when
their energies are comparable for the yrast SD band of $^{194}$Pb.
%
Given the present uncertainty of mean-field calculation concerning
the detailed relative location of the qpr's,
we cannot disregard $\nu$[624]9/2 as one of
candidates of the configuration of bands 3 and 4.
On Fig.\ 2 and in Table 1 we have also reported result for
the negative signature band built on
the $\nu$[642]3/2,$\alpha$=$-$1/2 quasiparticle.
%
Although the routhian of this state is lower than that of
the $\nu$[624]9/2 in the quasiparticle spectrum of $^{194}$Pb,
Table 1 shows that the [642]3/2 SD band is more excited.
%
This is a consequence of self-consistency effects.
Let us now see how these considerations can be extended to
the analysis of the nucleus $^{193}$Hg.
%
So far 6 SD bands including two identical bands have
been observed \cite{Jo94}.
%
Within the HFB method we have already performed a study
using the same Skyrme force parametrization for the
mean-field\cite{He95}.
%
On the other hand, in ref.\ \cite{He95} pairing correlations
have been described with a seniority interaction.
%
The results
of analysis limited to the
two interacting bands $\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$ =
$-$1/2 band (band 4) and $\nu$[512]5/2, $\alpha$ = $-$1/2
band (band 1) with a zero-range density dependent
pairing force are shown in Fig.\ 5
together with the experimental data.
%
For each band a separate HFB calculation has been performed.
%
Our calculation shows that this dual self-consistent
HFB analysis is able to reproduce the observed band interaction.
%
This is a significant improvement over the calculation
of ref.~\cite{He95} in which no interaction was found,
and it provides an additional indication of the superiority of
a surface-type zero-range pairing force over a seniority interaction.
%
On the other hand, the angular velocity at which
bands interact is found at $\hbar\omega\simeq0.15$MeV
instead of the observed value $\hbar\omega\simeq0.25$MeV.
%
This difference may reflect an inaccuracy of the relative location of
the relevant qpr's in $^{193}$Hg which would then be consistent with
our discussion on the position of orbitals
[752]5/2 and [512]5/2 in $^{195}$Pb.
In summary, we have analyzed the properties of the SD bands of two
odd-$N$ nuclei $^{195}$Pb and $^{193}$Hg by making use of the cranked
HFB method.
%
Our self-consistent calculation has confirmed the general belief that
the flat behavior of $\cal J$ in bands 1 and 2 of $^{195}$Pb is
related
to the curvature of the neutron intruder qpr.
%
For bands 3 and 4 we have found that configurations based on
the [624]9/2 and [512]5/2 are in competition.
%
Both the moment of inertia, the quadrupole moments
and the magnetic moments of these four SD bands are very similar.
%
In particular, within the HFB method these quantities do not provide
an effective mean of deciding the nature of the observed bands 3 and
4.
%
We have also calculated with qualitative success
the two interacting SD bands of $^{193}$Hg.
%
The results of this analysis provide additional support for an
effective pairing force acting predominantly at the nuclear surface.
%
The quantitative inaccuracy on the position of the crossing
frequencies
($\Delta\hbar\omega\approx$ 0.1 MeV) could be an indication that
qpr associated with the [512]5/2 is too low by 0.1 MeV
relative to the rest of the spectrum.
%
It is an interesting question
whether it is possible to determine an effective interaction
with the same global qualities of the SkM$^{\ast}$ force
which could also achieve a better precision
as regards the single-particle energies.
{\bf Acknowledgements}
We thank J.~Becker and L.~Farris for discussions on
the experimental results.
%
This work has been partly supported by the ARC convention
93/98-166 of the Belgian SSTC.
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
%
\bibitem{Vo93} D.\ T.\ Vo et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 71} (1993)
340
%
\bibitem{Dr91} M.\ W.\ Drigert et al., Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A530} (1991)
452
%
\bibitem{Ca90} M.\ P.\ Carpenter et al., Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 240}
(1990) 44
%
\bibitem{Fa95} P.\ Fallon et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 51} (1995) R1609
%
\bibitem{Jo94} M.\ J.\ Joyce et al., Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 340} (1994)
150
%
\bibitem{Ce94} B.\ Cederwall et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 72}
(1994) 3150
%
\bibitem{Fe90} P.\ B.\ Fernandez et al., Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A517}
(1990) 386
%
\bibitem{Az91} F.\ Azaiez et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 66} (1991)
1030
%
\bibitem{Az91b} F.\ Azaiez et al., Z.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 338} (1991) 471
%
\bibitem{Hu} J.\ R.\ Hughes et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ C
%
\bibitem{Hu94} J.\ R.\ Hughes et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 50} (1994)
R1265
%
\bibitem{Far95} L.\ P.\ Farris et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 51} (1995)
R2288
%
\bibitem{Wa91} T.\ F.\ Wang et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 43} (1991)
R2465
%
\bibitem{Cl95} R.\ M.\ Clark et al., Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 51} (1995)
R1052
%
\bibitem{Wy95} R.\ Wyss and W.\ Satu{\l}a, Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 351}
(1995) 393
%
\bibitem{Gi94} M.\ Girod, J.\ P.\ Delaroche, J.\ F.\ Berger and
J.\ Libert,
Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 325} (1994) 1
%
\bibitem{Sa91} W.\ Satu{\l}a, S.\ \'Cwiok, W.\ Nazarewicz, R.\ Wyss
and
A.\ Johnson, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A529} (1991) 289
%
\bibitem{Ga94} B.\ Gall, P.\ Bonche, J.\ Dobaczewski, H.\ Flocard,
P.-H. Heenen,
Z.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 348} (1994) 183
%
\bibitem{Bo96} P.\ Bonche, H.\ Flocard and P.-H.\ Heenen,
Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A598} (1996) 169
%
\bibitem{Te95} J.\ Terasaki, P.-H.\ Heenen, P.\ Bonche,
J.\ Dobaczewski and
H.\ Flocard, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A593} (1995) 1
%
\bibitem{Li60} H.\ J.\ Lipkin, Ann.\ Phys.\ (N.\ Y.\ ) {\bf 9}
(1960) 272
%
\bibitem{No64} Y.\ Nogami, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 134} (1964) B313
%
\bibitem{Pr73} H.\ C.\ Pradhan, Y.\ Nogami, J.\ Law, Nucl.\ Phys.\
{\bf 201} (1973)
357
%
\bibitem{Ba82} J.\ Bartel, P.\ Quentin, M.\ Brack, C.\ Guet and
H.-B.\ H{\aa}kansson,
Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A386} (1982) 79
%
\bibitem{He95} P.-H.\ Heenen, P.\ Bonche and H.\ Flocard,
Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A588} (1995) 490
%
\end{thebibliography}
\newpage
\noindent
Figure Captions
\noindent
\begin{itemize}
\item[Fig.~1] a) Experimental dynamical moments of inertia of the four
SD bands \cite{Far95} of $^{195}$Pb.
b) HFB dynamical moments of inertia of the lowest SD bands of
$^{195}$Pb.
( the negative signature bands are denoted with black symbols )
%
\item[Fig.~2] Calculated charge quadrupole moments $Q_{\rm c}$ of
the $\nu$[512]5/2, $\nu$[624]9/2 bands and the $\nu$[642]3/2,$\alpha$
= $-$1/2
band of $^{195}$Pb.
%
Correspondence between the symbols and the SD bands is the same as in
Fig.~1b.
\item[Fig.~3] Neutron qpr of $\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2 SD band.
%
The thick dotted curve indicates the occupied qpr.
%
Full (dashed) curves correspond to positive parity and positive
(negative)
signature, and dot-dashed (dotted) curves to negative parity and
positive (negative) signature.
\item[Fig.~4] Neutron qpr of $\nu$[624]9/2, $\alpha$=+1/2 SD band.
%
The thick full curve corresponds to the occupied qpr.
%
The other drawing conventions are the same as those used in Fig.\ 3.
\item[Fig.~5] Experimental dynamical moment of inertia $\cal J$ of
$^{193}$Hg for bands 1 (solid triangle) and
4 (solid circle).
%
Our results are indicated by open triangles for the $\nu$[512]5/2,
$\alpha$=$-$1/2
configuration and by open circles for the $\nu$[752]5/2, $\alpha$=$-$1/2
one.
%
\psfig{figure=f1.ps}
\psfig{figure=f2.ps}
\psfig{figure=f3.ps}
\psfig{figure=f4.ps}
\psfig{figure=f5.ps}
\end{itemize}
\end{document}