Abstract
This paper develops a framework to study the statistical power of revealed-preference tests. With randomly sampled budgets and mild smoothness of demand, statistical learning implies that any model consistent with the data must approximate true choice behaviour. We interpret this result as follows: passing a revealed-preference test is informative only to the extent that the data are sufficiently rich to rule out economically meaningful departures from the maintained model. We make this precise by linking sample size and confidence to the magnitude of detectable departures, and by characterising how power rises with additional observations. Extending our approach beyond revealed-preference inequalities to smooth functional restrictions yields practical tests, even when exact revealed-preference tests are computationally infeasible. We also provide confidence intervals for smooth functionals of demand, including welfare effects. Simulations show that standard sample sizes can generate widely different power across models, contextualizing why some conditions ``rarely reject'' in practice.
本页仅发布可检索的书目信息与作者摘要。HTML 正文、PDF 和 LaTeX 源文件是独立阅读资源，不作为搜索引擎落地内容。打开页面后会按浏览器语言自动翻译标题与摘要，并写入缓存。