Abstract
Neural techniques for simulation-based inference (SBI) have become popular in scientific domains featuring complex simulation models. These methods train neural networks on simulated data to infer unknown parameters; their reliability depends on the simulator faithfully representing reality. In infectious disease modeling, multiple models encoding different hypotheses often provide plausible explanations of observed data. Model selection is a difficult problem when likelihoods are unavailable, as is the case with many common stochastic transmission models. We propose a model criticism methodology designed for SBI, Neural Evidence Estimation (NEE), that integrates model selection and model misspecification detection. NEE learns a model's marginal likelihood (a.k.a. evidence) directly from simulations using normalizing flows, thereby avoiding noisy or complex Monte Carlo estimators. Through synthetic experiments, we demonstrate that NEE reliably selects the correct data generating process among multiple models and flags poorly specified models. We apply NEE to a real-world modeling problem concerning competing mechanisms for influenza reinfection in a multiple wave epidemic. This work argues for the importance of principled model criticism in SBI and infectious disease modeling.
本页仅发布可检索的书目信息与作者摘要。HTML 正文、PDF 和 LaTeX 源文件是独立阅读资源，不作为搜索引擎落地内容。打开页面后会按浏览器语言自动翻译标题与摘要，并写入缓存。